Connect with us

HTML Image

i

NZ News

More migrant workers left jobless after paying for accredited work visas

Published

on

Three Chinese migrant workers who were sacked within a month of each other by the same Auckland employer are the latest among at least 100 workers who are unemployed after paying thousands of dollars for their accredited employer work visas (AEWV).

As of May this year, over 63,075 people entered New Zealand under the scheme, which was designed to reduce exploitation.

But since September last year, Immigration New Zealand (INZ) has received 694 employment complaints linked to accredited employers, with more than half of those coming from Auckland.

As of the end of June, INZ had identified around 41 employers of “potential concern” involving migrant workers on accredited visas, but wouldn’t comment on current investigations.

The three workers from Northern China had visas tied to the construction company D&T Action Ltd, and were brought here by the New Zealand based Immigration service company Co Plan Group Ltd, also known as Tai Le Consultancy (泰勒移民留学顾问公司), which sourced the workers from a labour export firm in China.

But the companies all denied any wrongdoing.

Carpenter Guo You Cheng, 44, borrowed more than $22,000 to pay a labour export company in China for his work visa.

Guo said he did an online interview with the Auckland-based Co Plan Group, but was sacked from his construction job in April – just after about a month-and-a-half on the job.

“It’s been more than two months since I was fired, I’ve only had over a month worth of work, I can’t describe in words the trauma I’m going through over these two months,” said Guo, who hadn’t been able to pay rent and had been relying on his family to send money.

Guo claimed he was told by his employer there wasn’t enough work and was given a dismissal letter which said he was being let go within the trial period.

Guo’s contract contained a 90-day-trial clause which said his job could terminate with one week’s notice, however Guo claimed no one explained this to him when he signed an English contract which he couldn’t read.

Looking back, Guo said there were early red flags. He claims he was threatened by his manager on his first day.

“He threatened us, saying, you guys are coming in batches, if you don’t work well, I’ll fire you. I’ve fired people before you, this person got fired, if any of you can’t do the job, there’s another batch coming at the end of the month”, he said.

This made sense when Guo met two other workers from China who joined a week before he was sacked – and they were fired too after less than two weeks of work.

One of them was Feng Hong Jun who paid $17,000 to the same China-based labour-export firm and was also interviewed by the Co Plan Group.

Feng said he was also on a 90-day-trial he knew nothing about and was given the same reason for being dismissed – too many workers.

Feng said another few workers arrived from China to work for D&T Action just days after he was fired, and that they contacted him after they were dismissed.

“We come to New Zealand, and they fire him [Guo], and when the next batch comes, they fire us, it’s like a rotation,” he said.

Now he is left stranded and crippled by loans he took to pay for the opportunity.

“We’re too scared to go home, back home the debt collectors are knocking on our doors everyday, but here we don’t have work, what do we eat and drink? It’s too hard,” he said.

Li Guanyong, 37, is in the same situation, fired on the same day as Feng, and with Feng and Guo, they’ve banded together and lodged personal grievances against their former employer.

But the director of D&T Action, Dennis Yat Keung Lam, said the men didn’t meet the company’s standards, and under the 90-day-trial he could dismiss them.

Lam said he didn’t do the interviews, leaving that to the Co Plan Group.

He said he doesn’t know anything about the fees charged in China.

The company also denied threatening the workers.

Meanwhile, the three workers’ employment advocate May Moncur said it was worrying that accredited employers were not being sufficiently monitored.

“They should report to immigration about how long those workers remain in their employment, and what’s the reason for their departure if they’re no longer working there, and how many workers are dismissed during a trial period,” she said.

Moncur, who was also representing more than a dozen migrant workers in similar situations, said she had seen the 90 day trial period abused by companies and suggested that INZ should stop allowing employers to use it for migrant workers.

When asked for comment about the criticisms of the 90-day-trial period, INZ said it had nothing further to say on the matter.

It said it aimed to check around 15 percent of all accredited employers each year, but it had only started the checks in April this year.

As of mid-June, INZ had done post-accreditation checks for 257 out of over 23,000 accredited employers.

Figures from INZ show of the 694 complaints linked to accredited employers, 40 percent included allegations of migrant exploitation and about 20 percent pointed to possible immigration fraud.

The number of complaints had increased steadily since September last year, peaking at 131 complaints received in April.

The regions with the highest number of complaints were Auckland, 376, Wellington, 51, Waikato, 48 and Canterbury, 46.

Source: RNZ

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Police say person who fired gun at officers still at large

Published

on

Police say a person who fired a gun at officers in Napier is still at large.

Eastern District Commander Superintendent Joel Lamb said Police tried to stop a vehicle in the Pirimai Area at about 10pm on Tuesday.

He said someone in the back seat pointed what was presumed to be a firearm at officers pursuing the vehicle.

“Staff have then heard two distinct gunshots as the firearm was discharged.

“Fortunately, neither of our officers were injured, and the patrol vehicle did not sustain any damage.”

He said hours later, the vehicle was seen travelling north on the Waikato Expressway towards Auckland.

Police seized the vehicle at an address in Manurewa, but they had not found the alleged offender.

Lamb said people who lived at the Manurewa address were engaging with Police.

He said Eastern District and Counties Manukau Police were making enquiries.

“Presenting a firearm at a Police officer is a serious escalation that puts our staff and the wider community at risk. This behaviour is entirely unacceptable.

“We are taking this incident extremely seriously and will be pursuing all lines of enquiry to locate the offender and hold them accountable.”

Police asked anyone who witnessed the incident to contact Police on 105 or online using the reference number 261111/3764.

Information could also be provided anonymously via Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111.

rnz

Continue Reading

Latest News

New Zealand sides named for RLWC finals

Published

on

The players tasked with ending Australia’s Rugby League World Cup dominance have been named.

The Kiwis and Kiwi Ferns have announced their squads for this Sunday’s World Cup finals in Brisbane.

Both sides are chasing their first titles since 2008, and both are looking to end their opponents run of three crowns in a row.

“Our Kiwi Ferns have been so dominant in years gone by, and we want to bring dominance back to this jersey, so I think it will be a case of who wants it more,” said co-captain Georgia Hale of the impending clash.

The Kiwis get a major boost for the final as they welcome back Ronaldo Mulitalo after he served a one-match ban for a high tackle against Fiji Bati.

Mulitalo replaces Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad, who moves to the six-man bench, which again includes utility Te Maire Martin, middle forwards Naufahu Whyte, Erin Clark and Xavier Willison plus fullback Keano Kini.

Loose forward Joseph Tapine will make his 30th Test appearance in a familiar pack again, including second-rowers Isaiah Papali’i and Briton Nikora, and props James Fisher-Harris and Moses Leota.

Winger Jamayne Isaako is on the cusp of claiming the New Zealand record for most Test points.

His five goals against Tonga lifted his career points tally to 225 – level with Shaun Johnson – while centre Casey McLean goes into the final with 16 tries in just eight Tests.

Fisher-Harris will again captain the team.

Fullback Ponga said the goal of the group was clear.

“We have high expectations around what we want to achieve, and obviously winning a world Cup is one of them.”

Meanwhile, Ricky Henry has selected a settled side to take on the Jillaroos, led by their lethal centre combination of Stacey Waaka and Mele Hufanga.

Veteran Apii Nicholls takes the number one jersey, Leianne Tufuga and Mackenzie Wiki on the wings.

Henry has stuck with his halves pairing of Chantay Kiria-Ratu and Raecene McGregor with Alexis Tauaneai, Georgia Hale and Otesa Pule up front.

Rounding out the starting pack is Shaniece Monschau, Kaiyah Atai, and Angelina Teakaraanga-Katoa.

“We have been building well throughout the tournament; we understand the Jillaroos side, and will give it our all to make New Zealand proud this weekend,” said Henry.

RLWC Finals:

Kiwi Ferns vs Jillaroos- 6.10pm

Kiwis vs Kangaroos – 9.35pm

Sunday November 15

Suncorp Stadium, Brisbane

Live blog updates on RNZ

Kiwi Ferns:

1. Apii Nicholls 2. Leianne Tufuga 3. Mele Hufanga 4. Stacey Waaka 5. Mackenzie Wiki 6. Chantay Kiria-Ratu 7. Raecene McGregor 8. Alexis Tauaneai 9. Georgia Hale 10. Otesa Pule 11. Shaniece Monschau 12. Kaiyah Atai 13. Angelina Teakaraanga-Katoa.

Interchange: 14. Ashleigh Quinlan 15. Annessa Biddle 16. Shannon Mato 17. Ivana Lauitiiti.

Reserves: 18. Brooke Anderson 19. Zahara Temara 20. Brianna Clark 21. Abigail Roache 22. Tenika Willison.

Kiwis:

1. Kalyn Ponga, 2. Jamayne Isaako, 3. Dane Gagai, 4. Casey McLean, 5. Ronaldo Mulitalo, 6. Kodi Nikorima, 7. Jahrome Hughes, 8. James Fisher-Harris (c), 9. Jeremy Marshall-King, 10. Moses Leota, 11. Isaiah Papali’i, 12. Briton Nikora, 13. Joseph Tapine (v/c).

Interchange: 14. Te Maire Martin, 15. Naufahu Whyte, 16. Erin Clark, 17. Xavier Willison.

Reserves: 18. Keano Kini, 19. Phoenix Crossland, 20. Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad, 21. Scott Sorensen, 22. Leo Thompson.

rnz

Continue Reading

Latest News

Opportunities to mitigate multi-million-dollar RNZ budget blowout likely missed – experts

Published

on

Multiple opportunities to identify and mitigate a multi-million-dollar budget blowout at RNZ appear have been missed, according to the former executive director at Audit New Zealand.

The public broadcaster on Monday revealed a near $12 million shock financial loss after a litany of financial blunders, which will now lead to sweeping job cuts.

The $11.8m loss is more than 25 times the $470,000 RNZ had expected to lose over the year to June.

CEO Paul Thompson took responsibility for the result, and said internal reports gave an inaccurate picture of the finances, meaning the scale of the loss only became clear in October.

RNZ’s former chief financial officer Hilary Parker resigned unexpectedly in early October.

The board said it would commission an independent review into what went wrong.

Independent contractor Stephen Walker, who left the Audit Office earlier this year, said the size of the loss was surprising, as was the length of time it took to identify it – months after the financial year ended.

Stephen Walker.
Independent contractor Stephen Walker is a former executive director at Audit New Zealand.

Supplied / OAG

“Probably more of a concern is that they had seemingly been unaware that they were running up a significant deficit until they were in the preparation stage of their annual report in October.”

Walker said public entities typically produced monthly financial reports.

An interim audit also took place before the end of the financial year, he said, but if the organisation hadn’t identified significant losses at that stage, the auditor could also be in the dark.

“It seems that there’s a real weakness in forecasting and budgeting that’s occurred here and that the monthly accounts, when they’re produced, either haven’t identified these significant variances against budget or the magnitude of them really hasn’t come to light until right towards the end of the financial year,” Walker said.

“And really at that point, there’s no opportunity for the chief executive, the leadership team to take, and the board to take, any corrective action because the year has effectively been completed.”

Walker said the “significant miss” was difficult to account for given it was more than 10 percent of RNZ’s total funding.

He said based on RNZ’s annual report, financial complexity didn’t appear to be a factor.

“This $11.8m loss isn’t made up of one particular item … it seems to have been contributed to by a number of separate expense lines running over budget. So I don’t think it’s necessarily to do with complexity.”

Among the errors, RNZ wrongly counted $2m from land sales as income in its budget. Staff costs also came in $3.2m over budget, including $1.4m in redundancy payments.

Professor at Auckland University’s business school Norman Wong said based on media reports the issues identified were “significant and troubling”.

Norman Wong.
Norman Wong.

Supplied / University of Auckland

“But recognising the sale of land as income in their budget is a basic error that one would have expected to have been caught and corrected well before it got to this point.”

With funding reductions at RNZ over the past two years, Walker expected greater scrutiny of financial results.

“Virtually every public entity has had their annual budget reduced. And so you would expect … the leadership team on a monthly basis and board – I’m not sure how frequently the board will consider the information – but you would expect them to be interrogating the results on a regular basis throughout the year,” he said.

Walker said initiating an independent review was the correct course of action and that he’d want to understand what information the leadership team and the board were regularly receiving.

He said he’d “love to say” surprising financial results were rare, but conceded they occured on a semi-frequent basis during his time leading the Audit Office.

“The benefit of independent scrutiny by the Audit Office – and the auditors providing that support to the Auditor General – [is] that the reporting is fairly presented at the end of the year, whether it’s good, bad or ugly.”

rnz

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 The Buzz: Powered by Apna Network Limited - Concept by Digital Hub NZ