Connect with us

HTML Image

i

NZ News

Year in Politics: Changing fortunes, losses and gains

Published

on

Analysis – It was a year in which Labour’s support seeped away and its grip on power loosened until, in December, polls consistently showed National and ACT could form a government with a comfortable majority.

It didn’t happen suddenly, and it didn’t all happen in 2022.

During a private session at Labour’s annual conference in November, the party’s pollster Talbot Mills presented a graph which started at the 2020 election and which charted Labour’s support since the 2020 election.

The Herald obtained it, reported it and likened it to a Halloween horror movie for the party faithful.

It showed that Labour maintained majority in the polls until July 2021.

For six months after that it could have governed with just the Greens.

Then in March 2022 it lost that advantage, and over the winter it would have needed both the Greens and Te Māori Pati to govern.

Then it lost that too. From September National and ACT held a majority.

The graph also showed that the cost of living was currently considered by voters to be the biggest issue – it didn’t feature at all in 2020.

Labour had also lost voters’ confidence in running the economy – twice as many, 47 percent to 24 percent – believed National was better at it.

Throughout this period Jacinda Ardern was, and still is, the most preferred prime minister, so what changed to bring Labour down from an unprecedented single-party majority government to trailing the opposition?

Covid, the cost of living and Christopher Luxon.

Labour won the “red tide” election in 2020 because Ardern and her government had kept voters safer than nearly anywhere else as the pandemic raged around the world, and National was in disarray after chaotic leadership changes.

The elimination strategy had been tough but it had worked. The public were behind it. Ardern’s team of five million were playing the game.

In 2021 it all began to change.

A Ministry of Health review, published in June this year, said the first case of the Delta variant was detected on 17 August 2021. Until then, there hadn’t been any community transmission for 100 days.

Central Auckland on Wednesday 25 August 2021 on the eighth today of a Covid-19 lockdown.Auckland during lockdown. Photo: RNZ / John Edens
It was much more transmissible, harder to contain, and caused more serious illness.

At the time, only 18 percent of the population was fully vaccinated.

The government continued with its elimination strategy and ordered an immediate nationwide lockdown.

But Delta couldn’t be beaten. Cases continued to rise and the health system was straining to meet the needs of infected people, MIQ and quarantine.

“It quickly became apparent that we needed a new model for managing Delta,” MoH said in its review.

Gradually, and often confusingly, elimination morphed into managing the outbreak. Vaccination mandates were introduced, which were to become one of the government’s most controversial pandemic problems.

Lockdowns continued sporadically, with Auckland suffering the most, and the government knew that much of the public support that existed through the elimination period was no longer there.

The first Omicron case, also highly transmissible, appeared in January this year soon after alert levels had been replaced by the traffic light system.

Through February, March and April there were numerous changes to the rules amid increasing frustration.

The team of five million had played the game, and they were over it.

By September the government knew people had been through enough, and on 12 September the traffic lights were switched off.

By then the vaccination rate had reached around 95 percent. Vaccination didn’t stop people catching Covid but they were much less likely to become seriously ill.

Weekly instead of daily case numbers were released and the last regular health briefing was on 21 September.

Vast amounts of money had been spent to support the economy through the pandemic and the Reserve Bank had lowered interest rates to help keep it going.

With the country back to nearly normal and learning to live with Covid, a price had to be paid.

Inflation was taking hold around the world, it became known as the Covid hangover. New Zealanders started feeling it in 2021.

Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, which helped pushed up fuel prices, and it began to really hurt.

The government blamed international events and handed out a $350 cost of living payment for eligible income earners.

It cut petrol tax by 25 cents a litre and brought in half-price public transport fares. It tried to help poor families by tweaking benefits.

Inflation reached 7.3 percent and stayed there, which the government insisted was lower than a lot of other developed countries but that didn’t do anything to placate struggling families.

It knew, by December, that it couldn’t sustain that sort of spending and announced fuel tax would return to normal at the end of March next year, when half-price fares would also end.

Reserve Bank governor Adrian Orr. Photo:
The Reserve Bank, under a mandate to control inflation, began raising interest rates which fed through to mortgages.

In November governor Adrian Orr said the bank was deliberately engineering a recession which was necessary to deal with the “horrible environment” of embedded inflation.

A perfect storm was brewing, and it was going to happen in an election year.

Labour will remember 2022 as a terrible year, and it started badly with the occupation of Parliament.

A paving stone is thrown at police on the Bowen/Lambton cornerThe protest ended with a riot. Photo: VNP / Phil Smith
What began as a protest against vaccine mandates swelled to include conspiracy theorists, bigots of various kinds and, it seemed, anyone with a grievance about anything.

For 23 days in February and March Parliament’s beautiful grounds were trashed and vandalised, roads were choked with illegally parked vehicles and Wellingtonians often voiced their fury about police inaction.

It should have been shut down at the start, it got totally out of hand, and when the police did move in on 2 March there was a riot.

The occupation eclipsed all other political events and reporting, and while the government wasn’t directly blamed it didn’t come out of it well.

Ardern, in one of her year-end interviews, described it as “one of the most challenging parts of the year” and thought it had been very hard for New Zealanders to see it happening.

When Parliament got back to a normal existence the government got on with an agenda which included the huge projects of transforming the health system, getting Three Waters legislation through Parliament and replacing the Resource Management Act.

It also began changing the rules around the supermarket sector to curb excessive profits and bring down prices, but while there was a lot of talk about “helping Kiwis at the checkout” there were no short-term gains for families struggling with inflation.

And it made some serious blunders. Stuff gave Revenue Minister David Parker its Mistake of the Year award for the KiwiSaver tax debacle.

Labour MP Nanaia MahutaLocal Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver
Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta was at the centre of the entrenchment fiasco, which did nothing to ease the path of the highly controversial Three Waters project.

The legislation was passed just before Parliament adjourned.

In October the government announced farmers would start paying for agricultural emissions from 2025 through a scheme three years in the making, which caused rural rage and doomsday predictions for the future of New Zealand’s backbone industry.

Although the government would argue that it did many good things to help lower and middle income families during 2022, and it did, it was the big, transformative initiatives that made the headlines and, with the possible exception of the supermarket rule changes, they were vote losers.

Ardern’s last words before Parliament adjourned was an announcement that ministers had been told to take a hard look at their legislative agenda over the break because there was going to be some trimming down and a total focus on the economy.

Difficult and unpopular projects are likely to be dropped or put on hold – the RNZ/TVNZ merger being one of them.

Ardern suggested the government had taken on too much, and perhaps that was because it had its own majority and it could do what it liked.

In the process it might have forgotten what voters liked.

Throughout 2022, Labour’s loss was National’s gain.

Christopher Luxon was elected party leader in December 2021 and stabilised the caucus.

He was good at it, although he was helped by the party’s MPs having realised that unless they got their act together the party had no chance of presenting itself as an alternative government.

Under Luxon National steadily gained support, rising to the high 30s in the polls. By the end of the year it was well ahead of Labour.

The tactic was to keep up intense pressure on the government, particularly over the cost of living, with Luxon and his deputy and shadow finance minister Nicola Willis leading the charge.

They blamed the government for nearly everything that was going wrong, including the health system which was struggling with chronic staff shortages.

Luxon persisted with his claim the government was “addicted to spending” which he said was fuelling inflation.

National promised to be a prudent, responsible government but there was very little hard policy and no detail on what would be cut – something the government continually highlighted.

Luxon, early on in his reign, did promise tax cuts including abolishing the top tax rate but took that plan off the table when the Reserve Bank issued its recession warning.

He promised “full fiscals” would be presented well before the election, with costed policies. They will be eagerly awaited.

Luxon crept up on Ardern in the preferred prime minister stakes during the year but didn’t look like overtaking her.

That caused commentators to suggest voters weren’t sure about him – although polls showed a majority wanted a change of government, they hadn’t made up their minds about whether he was the right man to lead it.

Luxon will be working on that next year. He’s been gaffe-prone and his inexperience – he had been an MP for just a year when he became leader – has showed.

When those TV election debates come round, he’ll be tested by a very experienced opponent.

David SeymourACT Party leader David Seymour. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
ACT’s irrepressible leader David Seymour also had a good year, keeping his party’s support at around 10 percent despite National’s rise.

In Parliament he was better than Luxon at needling Ardern, and the prime minister’s “arrogant prick” comment proved it.

ACT, advantaged by National’s meltdown, won 10 seats in 2020 and nine of its MPs were rookies. There were predictions that at least one of them would be a loose cannon but that didn’t happen.

Caucus discipline was admirable and Seymour was able to maintain the party’s support level.

The Hamilton West by-election in December was described by RNZ as a litmus test for next year’s general election.

National easily took the Labour-held seat, and if the results really do play out nationwide the government is going to be in serious trouble.

Tama Potaka up on stage with his whanau after preliminary votes show he has won the Hamilton West seat by a comfortable margin.National’s Tama Potaka won the Hamilton by-election. Photo: RNZ / Andrew McRae
The Greens, who Labour will most definitely need if it gets a chance at a third term, also held their ratings through the year despite the bizarre refusal to re-appoint co-leader James Shaw at its annual conference in July.

A group of disgruntled members who didn’t think he was doing enough about climate change prevented him from getting enough votes to keep his position.

That forced another vote, which he won. No other candidate came forward.

The Greens appear immune from the sort of swings that can afflict minor parties and the party isn’t much affected by what happens to National or Labour.

Its support seems to be locked in and will probably stay that way through next year, unless it does something catastrophic.

Te Pāti Māori co-leaders Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer speak to RNZ at the end of 2022Te Pati Māori co-leaders Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver
Te Pati Māori, with its two co-leader MPs, made as much noise as it could during the year with its limited presence and was reported to have built up a solid grassroots organisation.

Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer appear to have a firm grip on the leadership and the party, with polls showing the prospect of at least the same representation after the general election and possibly one or two more MPs.

Then there was Winston Peters. New Zealand First, he declared in October, was back and would fight the next election.

In November, very unusually, he ruled out working with Labour in the next Parliament.

Peters had never before said which of the main parties he would join in coalition.

He didn’t say he would join National, but it would be either that or go on the cross benches.

First he has to get NZ First back into Parliament, and he needs 5 percent of the party vote to get there.

By year end polls were giving it between 3 percent and 4 percent – another comeback could be in reach.

The party usually does better than polls show, and Peters is a grievance politician who campaigns well.

He has a lot of grievances to work on this time.

*Peter Wilson is a life member of Parliament’s press gallery, 22 years as NZPA’s political editor and seven as parliamentary bureau chief for NZ Newswire.

Source – RNZ

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Police say person who fired gun at officers still at large

Published

on

Police say a person who fired a gun at officers in Napier is still at large.

Eastern District Commander Superintendent Joel Lamb said Police tried to stop a vehicle in the Pirimai Area at about 10pm on Tuesday.

He said someone in the back seat pointed what was presumed to be a firearm at officers pursuing the vehicle.

“Staff have then heard two distinct gunshots as the firearm was discharged.

“Fortunately, neither of our officers were injured, and the patrol vehicle did not sustain any damage.”

He said hours later, the vehicle was seen travelling north on the Waikato Expressway towards Auckland.

Police seized the vehicle at an address in Manurewa, but they had not found the alleged offender.

Lamb said people who lived at the Manurewa address were engaging with Police.

He said Eastern District and Counties Manukau Police were making enquiries.

“Presenting a firearm at a Police officer is a serious escalation that puts our staff and the wider community at risk. This behaviour is entirely unacceptable.

“We are taking this incident extremely seriously and will be pursuing all lines of enquiry to locate the offender and hold them accountable.”

Police asked anyone who witnessed the incident to contact Police on 105 or online using the reference number 261111/3764.

Information could also be provided anonymously via Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111.

rnz

Continue Reading

Latest News

New Zealand sides named for RLWC finals

Published

on

The players tasked with ending Australia’s Rugby League World Cup dominance have been named.

The Kiwis and Kiwi Ferns have announced their squads for this Sunday’s World Cup finals in Brisbane.

Both sides are chasing their first titles since 2008, and both are looking to end their opponents run of three crowns in a row.

“Our Kiwi Ferns have been so dominant in years gone by, and we want to bring dominance back to this jersey, so I think it will be a case of who wants it more,” said co-captain Georgia Hale of the impending clash.

The Kiwis get a major boost for the final as they welcome back Ronaldo Mulitalo after he served a one-match ban for a high tackle against Fiji Bati.

Mulitalo replaces Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad, who moves to the six-man bench, which again includes utility Te Maire Martin, middle forwards Naufahu Whyte, Erin Clark and Xavier Willison plus fullback Keano Kini.

Loose forward Joseph Tapine will make his 30th Test appearance in a familiar pack again, including second-rowers Isaiah Papali’i and Briton Nikora, and props James Fisher-Harris and Moses Leota.

Winger Jamayne Isaako is on the cusp of claiming the New Zealand record for most Test points.

His five goals against Tonga lifted his career points tally to 225 – level with Shaun Johnson – while centre Casey McLean goes into the final with 16 tries in just eight Tests.

Fisher-Harris will again captain the team.

Fullback Ponga said the goal of the group was clear.

“We have high expectations around what we want to achieve, and obviously winning a world Cup is one of them.”

Meanwhile, Ricky Henry has selected a settled side to take on the Jillaroos, led by their lethal centre combination of Stacey Waaka and Mele Hufanga.

Veteran Apii Nicholls takes the number one jersey, Leianne Tufuga and Mackenzie Wiki on the wings.

Henry has stuck with his halves pairing of Chantay Kiria-Ratu and Raecene McGregor with Alexis Tauaneai, Georgia Hale and Otesa Pule up front.

Rounding out the starting pack is Shaniece Monschau, Kaiyah Atai, and Angelina Teakaraanga-Katoa.

“We have been building well throughout the tournament; we understand the Jillaroos side, and will give it our all to make New Zealand proud this weekend,” said Henry.

RLWC Finals:

Kiwi Ferns vs Jillaroos- 6.10pm

Kiwis vs Kangaroos – 9.35pm

Sunday November 15

Suncorp Stadium, Brisbane

Live blog updates on RNZ

Kiwi Ferns:

1. Apii Nicholls 2. Leianne Tufuga 3. Mele Hufanga 4. Stacey Waaka 5. Mackenzie Wiki 6. Chantay Kiria-Ratu 7. Raecene McGregor 8. Alexis Tauaneai 9. Georgia Hale 10. Otesa Pule 11. Shaniece Monschau 12. Kaiyah Atai 13. Angelina Teakaraanga-Katoa.

Interchange: 14. Ashleigh Quinlan 15. Annessa Biddle 16. Shannon Mato 17. Ivana Lauitiiti.

Reserves: 18. Brooke Anderson 19. Zahara Temara 20. Brianna Clark 21. Abigail Roache 22. Tenika Willison.

Kiwis:

1. Kalyn Ponga, 2. Jamayne Isaako, 3. Dane Gagai, 4. Casey McLean, 5. Ronaldo Mulitalo, 6. Kodi Nikorima, 7. Jahrome Hughes, 8. James Fisher-Harris (c), 9. Jeremy Marshall-King, 10. Moses Leota, 11. Isaiah Papali’i, 12. Briton Nikora, 13. Joseph Tapine (v/c).

Interchange: 14. Te Maire Martin, 15. Naufahu Whyte, 16. Erin Clark, 17. Xavier Willison.

Reserves: 18. Keano Kini, 19. Phoenix Crossland, 20. Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad, 21. Scott Sorensen, 22. Leo Thompson.

rnz

Continue Reading

Latest News

Opportunities to mitigate multi-million-dollar RNZ budget blowout likely missed – experts

Published

on

Multiple opportunities to identify and mitigate a multi-million-dollar budget blowout at RNZ appear have been missed, according to the former executive director at Audit New Zealand.

The public broadcaster on Monday revealed a near $12 million shock financial loss after a litany of financial blunders, which will now lead to sweeping job cuts.

The $11.8m loss is more than 25 times the $470,000 RNZ had expected to lose over the year to June.

CEO Paul Thompson took responsibility for the result, and said internal reports gave an inaccurate picture of the finances, meaning the scale of the loss only became clear in October.

RNZ’s former chief financial officer Hilary Parker resigned unexpectedly in early October.

The board said it would commission an independent review into what went wrong.

Independent contractor Stephen Walker, who left the Audit Office earlier this year, said the size of the loss was surprising, as was the length of time it took to identify it – months after the financial year ended.

Stephen Walker.
Independent contractor Stephen Walker is a former executive director at Audit New Zealand.

Supplied / OAG

“Probably more of a concern is that they had seemingly been unaware that they were running up a significant deficit until they were in the preparation stage of their annual report in October.”

Walker said public entities typically produced monthly financial reports.

An interim audit also took place before the end of the financial year, he said, but if the organisation hadn’t identified significant losses at that stage, the auditor could also be in the dark.

“It seems that there’s a real weakness in forecasting and budgeting that’s occurred here and that the monthly accounts, when they’re produced, either haven’t identified these significant variances against budget or the magnitude of them really hasn’t come to light until right towards the end of the financial year,” Walker said.

“And really at that point, there’s no opportunity for the chief executive, the leadership team to take, and the board to take, any corrective action because the year has effectively been completed.”

Walker said the “significant miss” was difficult to account for given it was more than 10 percent of RNZ’s total funding.

He said based on RNZ’s annual report, financial complexity didn’t appear to be a factor.

“This $11.8m loss isn’t made up of one particular item … it seems to have been contributed to by a number of separate expense lines running over budget. So I don’t think it’s necessarily to do with complexity.”

Among the errors, RNZ wrongly counted $2m from land sales as income in its budget. Staff costs also came in $3.2m over budget, including $1.4m in redundancy payments.

Professor at Auckland University’s business school Norman Wong said based on media reports the issues identified were “significant and troubling”.

Norman Wong.
Norman Wong.

Supplied / University of Auckland

“But recognising the sale of land as income in their budget is a basic error that one would have expected to have been caught and corrected well before it got to this point.”

With funding reductions at RNZ over the past two years, Walker expected greater scrutiny of financial results.

“Virtually every public entity has had their annual budget reduced. And so you would expect … the leadership team on a monthly basis and board – I’m not sure how frequently the board will consider the information – but you would expect them to be interrogating the results on a regular basis throughout the year,” he said.

Walker said initiating an independent review was the correct course of action and that he’d want to understand what information the leadership team and the board were regularly receiving.

He said he’d “love to say” surprising financial results were rare, but conceded they occured on a semi-frequent basis during his time leading the Audit Office.

“The benefit of independent scrutiny by the Audit Office – and the auditors providing that support to the Auditor General – [is] that the reporting is fairly presented at the end of the year, whether it’s good, bad or ugly.”

rnz

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 The Buzz: Powered by Apna Network Limited - Concept by Digital Hub NZ