Connect with us

HTML Image

i

World

Australia’s teen social media ban unofficially begins today. Here’s what you need to know

Published

on

By Ange Lavoipierre, ABC News

After more than a year of planning and global scrutiny, the teen social media ban is finally a reality for more than 20 million Australian residents.

While the law officially kicks in on December 10, Meta has begun removing Instagram, Threads and Facebook accounts from today, December 4.

Here’s everything you need to know about the policy, from the ABC’s national technology reporter Ange Lavoipierre.

What is the teen social media ban?

Believe it or not, this is not actually a silly question, because the new rules aren’t what most people think.

In short, the “ban” is not exactly a ban.

An amendment to the Online Safety Act in November 2024 will force some (but not all!) social media companies to prevent (or try to prevent!) under-16s from holding an account on their platforms (but not from using them!).

The bits in brackets often get missed in the public debate, but the reality is that this policy won’t actually block all under-16s from all social media, even if it does work as designed.

And to be clear, no-one, including the government, is expecting a flawless start.

That said, I’m still going to call it a “ban” because, for better or worse, that’s the name that’s stuck.

So from the top, here are the most important things to know for now: what the new rules will and won’t do, and what they mean for you.

Which platforms are in and which platforms are out?

At the time of writing, the law applies to only ten of the bajillion or so websites in the world you might, if you were feeling generous (or cruel, perhaps) describe as “social media”.

So far, the platforms in question are Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, Reddit, Twitch, Kick, and Threads.

Already, there are signs plenty of under-16s are planning to move to other platforms that aren’t covered by the new rules, such as Yope, Lemon8 and RedNote.

But there’s no guarantee those sites will be left out of the ban forever, with the government warning the list could grow, setting the stage for the world’s most expensive and annoying game of whack-a-mole.

Proving the point, Reddit, Kick and Twitch were only added in November.

No matter what happens to the list, it seems as if under-16s will still have plenty of places to gather online, even if they’re not the places they’re used to.

What will the platforms have to do?

Politicians love to say that platforms must comply with the laws “or face A$50 million fines” but compliance doesn’t necessarily mean catching every single user under-16.

The law only says that platforms must take “reasonable steps” to prevent under-16s from holding an account.

If people bypass the ban, it’s not a fine-able offence.

As for what constitutes “reasonable steps”, it boils down to a platform checking every user’s age, or being confident they don’t need to, which you could argue is the same thing.

There’s more detail about what is meant by age checking below, but the main thing to know is that social media companies don’t actually need to be certain of your date of birth.

The rules are clear there’s no need to “verify” age. The platform only has to make a well-informed guess.

The other reason you could argue this isn’t truly a ban is the platforms don’t have to keep young people from looking at the platforms altogether – it’s all about who’s allowed to hold an account. There’s nothing in the law to prevent under-16s from accessing those websites in what’s called a “logged-out” state.

Most of the platforms, including YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, Facebook and Reddit, will let you see a fair bit of content without an account, although they’d all say the most harmful stuff will remain hidden.

Perhaps the key difference is that logged-out users aren’t fed content that’s been optimised to keep them glued to their screens for hours on end, in many cases by learning their preferences and ruthlessly exploiting their insecurities.

How are the platforms going to check age?

Platforms have been given a menu of options for checking your age, and they’ll all offer more than one.

The most accurate option on the table is age verification, which almost always involves handing over government-issued ID, such as a drivers licence.

The government has been at pains to make clear that the law forbids ID from being the only age-checking method on offer, but the law is less clear as to whether ID is allowed to be the last resort, when other age-checking methods fail.

Another option, and one which is shaping up to play a big role, is facial-age estimation.

In this scenario, you agree to let AI software guess your age based on your physical characteristics, usually by scanning your face.

Having seen it in action, it’s not always accurate – it can be wrong in either direction. Even industry proponents say it shouldn’t be relied on as a sole solution, especially for people closer to the cut-off age.

The third main method is age inference, where a platform guesses your age based on what it already knows about you – things like how long your account has existed, your posts, your interests and your personal networks.

That said, there are privacy rules against platforms being too creepy in how they go about this.

Companies aren’t allowed to bundle too much information together and, no matter which method they use, they have to delete the data after they’ve used it.

And hey, if any of this feels confusing, you’re not hallucinating!

Every platform is using a different combination of methods and service providers to check our ages.

For example, YouTube, Meta and Snapchat have all announced their plans in recent weeks.

What will change for people?

For under-16s, the impact is too obvious to mention.

For many Australian adults, however, it’s possible very little will change.

What’s becoming clear is that many social media platforms are quite happy to use the data they already have about existing users to rule them in, when they’re well and truly over 16, which means those people might never be asked for more data.

On the other hand, anyone starting a new account, and some existing users over 16, especially those closer to the cut-off age, will be asked to demonstrate their age another way – probably with ID or a face scan.

For anyone who either can’t or won’t do that, things might get bumpy.

Platforms are obliged to provide avenues for appeal in case they get it wrong, but we’re still waiting to see how smoothly those systems will work, and whether they might ultimately depend on people providing the exact same data they couldn’t or wouldn’t provide in the first place.

Source: ABC & RNZ

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

Voters deliver historic rebuke to Trump as Democrats win House and Senate

Published

on

By Joseph Ax, Brad Heath and Jason Lange

Democrats seized control of both the Senate and House on Tuesday (US time), scoring sweeping victories in Republican strongholds for the first time in generations as tens of millions of voters delivered a scathing rebuke to President Donald Trump.

Voters in conservative bastions who had propelled the president to his second term in office just two years ago swung dramatically toward Democrats, fueled by deep frustration over the unpopular war with Iran, anxiety over the high cost of living and anger at Trump’s stewardship of the country.

Kansas elected its first Democratic senator since the Great Depression nearly a century ago. In South Carolina, a state that Trump carried by nearly 18 points in 2024, Democrats turned aside his hand-picked Senate candidate.

And in Texas, the biggest Republican state, Democrats ended a decades-long losing streak in seismic fashion, winning a Senate seat and ousting three-term Governor Greg Abbott.

The results will usher in a new era of divided government in Washington, following two years in which the Republican-controlled Congress rarely exercised its power to rein in Trump.

Once seated in January, Democrats are expected to use their power to investigate Trump’s administration, family and allies and demand concessions on major legislation. The Democratic Senate can block Trump’s nominees, including any US Supreme Court justices should a vacancy arise.

“There is now a generational remake of the Senate map that is going to change America,” said Chuck Schumer, the party’s Senate minority leader. “Americans voted for change, and now Democrats must deliver.”

Trump, who is barred by the US Constitution from seeking a third term, has exercised an iron grip on his party for most of the last decade. But the new balance of power in Washington may accelerate his lame-duck status, as attention turns toward the 2028 presidential race and potential successors begin competing for political influence in a post-Trump world.

Despite worries from Democrats that Trump might seek to overturn the election results, as he did in 2020, the president accepted the outcome, congratulating Democrats in an interview with Fox News. He also said he would work with Democrats on issues such as immigration, though he threatened to veto any “insane” bills they passed.

rnz

Continue Reading

World

Cold case solved: DNA links serial killer Ted Bundy to 1974 murder of Utah teen

Published

on

A Utah cold case tied to notorious serial killer Ted Bundy has been solved.

Fifty-two years to the day her body was found, detectives closed the investigation into the murder of 17-year-old Melissa Ann Smith. DNA evidence identified Bundy as the killer, investigators revealed Tuesday.

Smith’s body was found by hunters in a wooded area bordering Salt Lake and Summit counties on 27 October, 1974. The investigation into her murder has remained open since that day, until now.

A recent break in a Utah County cold case is being attributed to the resolution. Investigators say the same DNA profile used to identify Bundy as the killer of Laura Ann Aime was used to solve Smith’s murder.

Developments in that case brought the Smith investigation back to the surface and helped resolve the decades-old mystery, Summit County Sheriff Kacey Bates said.

Tuesday’s announcement was hinted at by Utah County investigators in April, when they announced the closure of the Aime cold case, which was tied to Bundy. At the time, a UCSO detective said the DNA profile used to link Bundy to the murder had been shared with other departments, with the hope that it could lead to closing more cases.

Bundy, who is confirmed to have killed and assaulted women across Washington, Oregon, Colorado, Utah and Florida between 1974 and 1978, confessed to 28 murders but is believed to be responsible for hundreds of deaths.

He was executed by electric chair in Florida in 1989.

Source: RNZ & CNN

Continue Reading

World

Netanyahu touts Trump endorsement on eve of vote, suggests they may restart war on Iran

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu boasted of his endorsement from Donald Trump on the eve of Israel’s election, suggesting the two leaders could restart their war against Iran if he wins, after Trump said they should “finish the job”.

“US President Donald Trump has come with a friendship that has never existed before between an Israeli prime minister and an American president. And it is doubtful we will ever have such a friendly president again,” Netanyahu said in a televised appearance late on Sunday night. “He has another two years, and he says he is calling on you to vote for me.”

In his own social media post on Sunday, Trump, who launched the Iran war jointly with Netanyahu in February, said: “Vote for Bibi Netanyahu for Prime Minister, we have to finish the job that we started!”

Netanyahu said Trump was willing to take action “that would finally, finally, remove the Iranian threat”, but only as long as Netanyahu himself remains in power.

“And I have already instructed the Mossad and the IDF (military) to bring down this regime, to bring down this regime because that is the only way to put an end to this threat,” Netanyahu said, referring to Israel’s main intelligence service and military.

Asked for comment on Netanyahu’s remarks, White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly said: “As President Trump stated, Iran is in very bad condition, both economically and militarily, and the blockade will remain in full force and effect, with oil flowing in record numbers of barrels through the Hormuz Strait.”

“The United States will not be attacking Iran at any time prior to the midterm elections,” Kelly added via email, referring to the November 3 vote in the US.

Netanyahu’s leading opponent, centrist former military Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot, posted his own comments on social media, praising Trump as “a true friend of Israel”.

“I value his efforts and his commitment to Israel’s security, and I am confident that he will work in full cooperation with any leader chosen by the people.”

Former Israeli Defence Minister Benny Gantz (2nd-R) and former Israeli army chief of staff Gadi Eisenkot (R), both members of the current Israeli five-person war cabinet led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, meet with the visiting US Secretary of State in Tel Aviv on February 8, 2024. (Photo by Mark Schiefelbein / POOL / AFP)
Former Israeli Defence Minister Benny Gantz (2nd-R) and former Israeli army chief of staff Gadi Eisenkot (R).

Mark Schiefelbein / POOL / AFP

Eisenkot accuses Netanyahu of fear-mongering

Tuesday’s vote, Israel’s first since the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks, is the first chance for voters to deliver a verdict on the worst security failure in generations and the wars on multiple fronts that followed.

With Netanyahu already at the helm of the most right-wing government in Israeli history, politics have shifted even further to the right. Nearly all Jewish-led parties, including that of the hawkish Eisenkot, now oppose the “two-state solution” that underpinned decades of peace negotiations with the Palestinians.

But many voters say the divisive politics of Israel’s longest-serving leader make the country weaker. Polls suggest Netanyahu’s Likud Party will lose seats, potentially depriving his coalition of right-wing, far-right and ultra-Orthodox parties of its narrow majority.

Eisenkot and an array of opposition parties ranging from the rump of the centre-left to the right, also have no clear path to unseat him.

Netanyahu, 77, is an unrivaled master of political survival: the only time since 2009 that opponents managed to wrest him briefly from the premiership, it took four inconclusive elections within two years to get him out. He was back 18 months later.

Neither side planned major public events for Monday. But both posted on social media, drumming on the election’s major themes: for Netanyahu, that he is the only leader with the mettle to face down Israel’s enemies; for his opponents, that his divisive politics have weakened the country.

Netanyahu shared an AI-generated video on Monday of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, whose father Ali Khamenei was killed on the first night of US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February. Lying in a hospital bed, the younger Khamenei says his own vote would be “definitely not Bibi. Another term like this and I will be meeting my father sooner than expected.”

On Sunday Netanyahu posted a computer-generated photo of a mushroom cloud over Tel Aviv, saying Israel was in existential danger from Iran.

Eisenkot responded by accusing him of “relying on a campaign of fear-mongering, lies, and threats – including images of nuclear bombs in the heart of Tel Aviv. This time, it won’t work for him.”

Trump’s endorsement of Netanyahu carries its own political risks a week before a legislative election in which his own Republicans are seeking to hold onto power.

The Iran war is deeply unpopular in the United States, blamed for a surge in prices especially for fuel. Major fighting has been suspended for months after ceasefire negotiations held without Israeli participation.

Source: Reuters & RNZ

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 The Buzz: Powered by Apna Network Limited - Concept by Digital Hub NZ