Uncategorized
Benefit sanctions: Government building ‘a legacy of cruelty’, critics say
Opposition parties have come out swinging against the announcement of benefit sanctions, with the Greens accusing the government of “pushing more people into poverty”.
Social Development Minister Louise Upston announced a ramping up of benefit sanctions would begin from June – particularly for young people.
The ministry would begin “work check-ins” for jobseekers who have been on a benefit for at least six months, “particularly young people” to “make sure job seeker beneficiaries are taking appropriate steps to find employment and are receiving the right help”.
She told Checkpoint the announcement signalled a “reset” of the welfare system.
But Labour’s social development spokesperson Carmel Sepuloni said the government was unfairly assuming jobseekers were not wanting to start employment education or training pathways.
“Rather than being stingy on the minimum wage and bashing beneficiaries, the coalition government should be focused on lifting incomes for the poorest New Zealanders.
“People deserve to be supported in to meaningful, long term employment, and sanctions will not do this.”
Sepuloni said the government pointed to evidence more than a decade old and that the most recent research from the Welfare Experts Advisory Group suggested that obligations and sanctions were problematic.
Meanwhile, Green Party social development and employment spokesperson Ricardo Menéndez March said the government was creating another measure to penalise the poorest people.
“Sanctions do not work. They do not support people into meaningful employment, nor support them to participate fully in their communities. Taking away people’s incomes only makes it harder for people to get by,” he said.
“This government is quickly building a legacy of cruelty. Instead of supporting people to provide for themselves and their whānau, this government has actively sought to push people further and further into poverty.”
New Zealand’s largest education union, NZEI Te Riu Roa, has also strongly condemned the “punitive sanctions” against people on welfare benefits.
NZEI Te Riu Roa president Mark Potter. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver
It said any sanctions a government took against beneficiaries directly affected their children and their learning.
“We all know that whānau are struggling with the rising cost of living; and the children of beneficiaries will be feeling it doubly so. Children need a full stomach and a roof over their head to learn,” said the union’s president Mark Potter.
“Data from the PISA international survey from December last year shows us that there is a strong correlation between food security and learning, and we know that food security disproportionately affects tamariki Māori, who make up nearly a quarter of the students currently enrolled in schooling.”
Potter said welfare sanctions were not effective ways to get people into jobs and the sanctions would further punish the country’s “most vulnerable citizens”.
“This step undercuts his government’s commitment to ensuring every child experiences success in learning, because it will only increase the numbers of children living in poverty who will then struggle with learning,” he said.
But the ACT party said the benefit sanctions were a “crucial lever” to deal with the “persistent minority” of people who opted to remain on a benefit long-term, even when they were in a position to work.
ACT social development spokesperson Dr Parmjeet Parmar said the minister has sent “an important signal that if you can work, you should work”.
“Over 351,000 working-age New Zealanders were receiving a main benefit as of June 2023 – that’s more than one-in-ten working age New Zealanders and, pre-COVID, 71 percent of main benefit recipients had been on welfare continuously for more than a year,” she said.
“Greater use of existing sanctions is a first step toward a wider package of more substantial consequences for healthy long-term beneficiaries who evade work.”
rnz
Analysis – Three years ago, Christopher Luxon headed into his first head-to-head debate with Chris Hipkins on the back of a poll that had National on 37 points and able to form a government with ACT alone.
Labour under then-Prime Minister Chris Hipkins was on a downward spiral on 27 percent in that same 1News-Verian poll and had no path to power.
Fast-forward three years and both parties headed into Tuesday night’s debate with two fresh new polls.
RNZ-Reid Research’s results had National on 26 percent and Labour on 31, while 1News-Verian had a much tighter race with just one point in it and both parties just under 30.
Those results spell early retirement and unemployment for a decent number of National Party MPs currently enjoying the government benches.
MMP has evolved so much in the past two elections that the combined Labour-National vote has gone from 81 percent at the 2017 election to just 57 in Tuesday’s RNZ-Reid Research poll.
So-called minor parties have grown in both size and influence, capturing the imagination of voters that traditionally voted blue or red.
Increasingly polling is suggesting another new party – Opportunity – has a good chance of making it into Parliament and being a potential kingmaker.
There’s now a very real possibility that the next government could be made up of four political parties.
That has happened before under Sir John Key’s National government in 2008, but because he chose to welcome the Māori Party into the fold, not because he had to.
The minor parties of 2026 have leverage and power going into any coalition talks well beyond any previous election years.
It makes a head-to-head between Christopher Luxon and Chris Hipkins far more redundant in this political age.
TVNZ/Harley Peters
They can’t fully commit to any of the promises they make because the slate is almost entirely wiped clean after 7 November when political parties sit down to discuss what a future government might look like.
Luxon has ruled out working with Opportunity after the election because of its land tax policy and National campaigning on no new taxes.
On Tuesday night he repeatedly refused to answer whether he would pick the phone up if he needed the party to be prime minister.
Instead, he repeated his previous comments about an untenable land tax, and then told reporters after the debate the question was a “hypothetical” that didn’t need an answer.
To be clear, that’s not a no.
At times in the debate the leaders could have been put in a time machine and transported back to three years ago, so similar were some of the issues and answers to them.
The cost of living crisis continued to be the overwhelming theme, a healthcare system under pressure and patients waiting too long in emergency departments hadn’t improved, and neither Chris had fully grasped the meaning of a yes or no question.
There was no big revelation or pledge – on the latter neither party has the headroom in their fiscal plans to do so.
It’s unlikely undecided voters watching were swayed one way or the other by the end of it.
That’s not to say the two Chrises performed badly.
They were both across their briefs, and while they had some nervous energy at the outset both settled into a comfortable rhythm and got their key messages across.
While Hipkins managed to land a few blows on Luxon over his failure to discipline New Zealand First’s Winston Peters and Shane Jones over racist remarks, Luxon in return made a strong argument on education and had Hipkins concede he had done what Labour couldn’t and got India across the line on a free trade agreement.
The biggest controversy of the night was the pair being asked to pick between the All Blacks and the Warriors with Luxon going Team ABs while Hipkins chose to “Up the Wahs”.
Both would have gone to bed happy with their performance and grateful they didn’t say or do anything they deeply regretted.
There is a week until they face-off again – another week of smiling at the cameras and hoping voters return them to the major party league.
rnz
Police say person who fired gun at officers still at large
New Zealand sides named for RLWC finals
Parliamentary Service working on extra chairs and offices for increased number of MPs
-
Latest News2 months ago‘Chilling’: Business groups speak out against National’s supermarket break-up plan
-
NZ News2 months agoTom Phillips report: The missed opportunities to find the children
-
Politics2 months agoNational vows to try to split Pak’nSave and New World
-
Latest News2 months agoCars bearing Chinese police markings stir unease in Auckland
-
Fiji News2 months agoPlans to have new Constitution by Dec 24th 2026
-
NZ News2 months agoCop who stole $68,000 can now be named as champion Muay Thai fighter Haimona Tamati-Te Paki
-
Politics2 months agoMBIE confirms botched biometric projects costs blown out to $50.7 million
-
Latest News2 months agoFive Karangahape Road venues lose their liquor licences after police intervention