Warning: This story contains details that some readers might find distressing.
A mother who tied her son to a bed and poured boiling water over him, leaving him with serious burns to 25 percent of his body, continues – more than two years into her jail sentence – to deny harming him.
The woman, who has maintained the boy caused his injuries when he tripped while carrying a pot of hot pasta water, has recently tried to have her conviction overturned, claiming her son was an unreliable witness.
According to the High Court decision released on 19 December, the boy, when he spoke with authorities, had agreed with his mother’s account of how the burns were caused.
But he later told a caregiver that his mother had actually tipped water on him from a kettle while he was restrained to a bed with a plastic bag beneath him.
The woman, who has permanent name suppression to protect the identity of her son, denied the accusation but pleaded guilty to a charge of ill-treatment of a child, relating to her failure to seek appropriate medical assistance for his burns.
She went on to defend a charge of intentionally causing him grievous bodily harm at a judge-alone trial in the Palmerston North District Court.
Judge Stephanie Edwards found the woman guilty and in October 2021 she was sentenced to eight-and-a-half-years imprisonment.
However, last month she appealed her conviction, submitting the evidence relied on by Judge Edwards at trial was insufficient for her to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt of the woman’s guilt.
In the High Court decision of Justice Peter Churchman, who heard the appeal, it stated the boy was 11 years old when he was taken to Palmerston North Hospital on 19 May, 2019, with severe burns to 25 percent of his body.
He was transferred to the National Burns Centre at Middlemore Hospital the next day.
Hospital staff became concerned that his injuries were not consistent with his mother’s account of how they occurred. She claimed that on 14 May, 2019, her son was cooking pasta when he tripped and spilled the pot of boiling water and pasta on himself.
But police and Oranga Tamariki conducted a joint investigation and obtained evidence she had been buying items used to treat his burns at home from 9 May onwards.
The boy was discharged into the care of an Oranga Tamariki-approved caregiver in mid-August and within a few days of arriving, he revealed to the caregiver it was his mother who had caused the burns. He later repeated the accusations to a social worker.
The decision stated he had not previously told anyone because he was scared his mother “would get angry”, and that she had instructed him to tell people it was the pasta water.
At trial, Judge Edwards considered an evidential video interview (EVI) of the boy, in which he expanded upon his account of how he sustained the burns.
She found the details he gave on the incident were “quite specific and therefore plausible” but also noted that some of his evidence seemed “incredible, other parts exaggerated or embellished”.
But it was the expert medical evidence from Richard Wong-She, who was the clinical lead at the National Burns Centre at Middlemore Hospital and the boy’s treating clinician, that determined the case for Judge Edwards.
Wong-She accepted the pasta water scenario as a possible cause of the injuries but stated the boy’s account was the “more likely cause” of the burns.
On appeal, the woman submitted Judge Edwards erred in failing to find that the boy was an unreliable witness, and that there were discrepancies between his account of what occurred and the medical evidence.
She argued the boy’s credibility was damaged by false allegations he made in his EVI, and that Wong-She’s medical evidence was entirely dependent on the accuracy and reliability of the boy’s statement.
“The appellant submits that the medical evidence, in combination with the boy’s account, was therefore insufficient to establish the charge proved beyond reasonable doubt,” Justice Churchman’s decision stated.
In his analysis, Justice Churchman found Judge Edwards had carefully considered Wong-She’s evidence.
“The judge considered both possibilities and was entitled to find the charge proven beyond reasonable doubt on the basis of the evidence before her, in particular that of Wong-She.”
In dismissing the woman’s appeal against her conviction, Justice Churchman said he was not satisfied there was anything in her submissions that gave rise to a real risk that the verdict reached was unsafe.
“Neither do I disagree with the factual findings reached by the judge.”
The woman must serve one-third of her sentence before being eligible for parole.
The Trump administration denounced CNN on Thursday (local time) for airing a portion of the new Iranian supreme leader’s public statement, the second time in three days the network has been targeted for reporting on how the regime is responding to the American attacks.
The attack illustrated the care news outlets must take in reporting during wartime, and the responsibilities of American journalists to report the perspective of countries its government views as enemies. It also exposed inconsistencies.
The message of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei during his first public statement since he succeeded his father, who was killed in an Israeli airstrike, was widely available elsewhere.
The White House said on social media that “fake news CNN just aired four straight minutes of uninterrupted Iranian state TV, run by the same psychotic and murderous regime that prided itself on brutally slaughtering Americans for 47 years”.
Earlier CNN interview criticised by Trump’s communications leader
Two days earlier, White House communications director Steven Cheung took issue with CNN anchor Erin Burnett’s interview with Hossein Mousavian, a former Iranian nuclear negotiator. Burnett asked Mousavian what he had been hearing about the Iranian government’s interest in having talks with the United States. There wasn’t much, he said.
“Ever notice how CNN just regurgitates quotes and unverified information from Iranian terrorists?” Cheung wrote on X.
“Total disgrace. They have become the murderous Iranian Regime’s version of Pravda,” he said, referring to the official newspaper of the former Soviet Union.
CNN did not address Cheung’s statement but did respond to the White House attack on Thursday. It noted that CNN, Sky News and Al Jazeera also showed portions of the ayatollah’s statement live.
“The world is watching with anticipation which direction this war will take,” CNN said. “Purported remarks from Iran’s new supreme leader are a critical component in helping audiences understand where this conflict is heading and were aired for their obvious news value.”
Other news outlets, including The Associated Press, sent out alerts on what Khamenei said. His vow to keep up attacks on other Arab countries in the region and plans to choke off the world’s oil supply were headlines.
Mojtaba Khamenei, the son of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, center, attends the annual Quds, or Jerusalem Day, rally in Tehran, Iran, May 31, 2019. (Source: Associated Press)
The New York Times led its website with a story on the speech in its immediate aftermath, later writing that the speech “was an early indication of how the new supreme leader would approach the war, as well as how he would lead the country”.
CNN has long been a favoured target of President Donald Trump, dating back to his first term. It’s a particularly vulnerable time for the network with Paramount Global’s agreement to purchase CNN’s parent company, Warner Bros Discovery, raising questions about its future editorial independence.
CNN showed a news anchor reading a portion of Khameini’s remarks in Farsi, with an English translation. It did not air them in full. After the speech, correspondent Nick Paton Walsh gave a debrief to anchor Kate Bolduan, noting how the non-appearance of the leader — reportedly injured in an air attack — was as important as what he said.
“We were waiting to see the face of the man to have proof of his health and survival,” Walsh said, “and they’ve not met that moment. Instead, a handwritten message, it seems, that mostly reiterates things we kind of already knew.”
A social media message board for Iran’s point of view
The Tech Transparency Project has reported that several Iranian leaders and institutions maintain verified accounts on X, formerly Twitter, owned by Trump ally Elon Musk. CNBC said Thursday that Khamenei has one of them, and an X account with his portrait posted the text of his remarks, available in Farsi and in an English translation.
Even though Khamenei’s father is dead, an account with his portrait was active on Thursday, mainly reposting messages from his son. “The revenge we have in mind is not just because of the martyrdom of the illustrious Leader of the Revolution,” read one message posted Thursday. “Every member of the nation martyred by the enemy is a separate case that demands we seek revenge.”
X is officially blocked in Iran, although many use a virtual private network to bypass restrictions. A message sent to the platform on Thursday was not immediately returned.
There’s a long history of journalists seeking interviews with world leaders, even when they are regarded as enemies of the United States. Most notable was 60 Minutes correspondent Mike Wallace’s interview with Iran’s Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979, when that country was holding Americans hostage.
Thursday’s remarks by Iran’s new supreme leader were absolutely newsworthy and legitimate for CNN to air them, said Jane Ferguson, a veteran international correspondent and founder of the journalism platform Noosphere. It’s not the job of government leaders to pick apart what CNN is reporting, she said.
“We’ve always faced this,” she said, about when reporters interview leaders or other figures hostile to American interests. “This has been a bit of low-hanging fruit for a while.”
Historian Douglas Brinkley of Rice University said that it’s unfair for CNN to be singled out in this instance. He, too, believes it is newsworthy to learn what leaders of an adversary are thinking, but it’s important to make sure that journalists are careful.
“You have to be leery of being used as a propaganda tool by the Iranian regime,” he said. “On the other hand, knowing what the enemy is saying and looking for a sign of a peace offering or a nuance is important … It’s a difficult balance.”
A fire at the University of Auckland law school building has now been extinguished.
A Fire and Emergency spokesperson said there had been a fire at the University and six fire trucks were at the scene on Short Street. The call to 111 came through at about 2.40pm.
FENZ said the fire was now extinguished but crews will stay near the building this afternoon.
Staff and students were seen going in floor by floor, starting with level 6, to retrieve any belongings left behind
A student who was evacuated from the fourth floor of the building said it seemed the fire started on level two.
Police were at the scene talking to students who have been evacuated.
Student Talisha Lal said when the fire alarm went off she, and other students, thought it was a drill.
Lal said once she was out of the building, she could see smoke.
An Auckland teacher has had her registration cancelled after recording explicit videos of herself urinating on the floor of a classroom and on a student’s belongings.
The New Zealand Teachers Disciplinary Tribunal found Lisa Marie Edmondson had committed serious misconduct.
The school was alerted to the content after the deputy principal of the school was approached by a member of the public who had come across a video on TikTok and recognised the setting. A search for the username led to a pornographic account.
The account contained more than 30 explicit videos which had been recorded at various locations over a period of two-and-a-half years.
In one of the videos, Edmondson appeared to urinate on the floor of a classroom with genitalia clearly visible. A second video showed the teacher urinating on a hat with a student’s name clearly visible in a lost property box.
The summary of facts stated there was an “ongoing urine smell” in some classrooms during the time of her employment which had been attributed to rats and mice. Bait stations had been set up during the school holidays but no rodent activity was noted. The tribunal said her students were “likely to have been adversely affected” due to evidence of an “unpleasant smell that required deep cleaning”.
While she was not visible in the videos, the teacher was recognised due to her voice and clothing.
Edmondson resigned in May 2023 after receiving notice of a formal investigation.
Following her resignation, Edmondson worked as a relief teacher at a second school before being invited to apply for a fixed-term position.
The tribunal found that Edmondson had failed to disclose her full employment history when applying for – and subsequently working at – a new school in 2023 and failing to inform her employer that she was the subject of a mandatory report and current investigation by the Teaching Council.
In her reflective statement, Edmondson acknowledged that she had let her students down and “was not the role model that I should have been for them”.
“I have accepted that the likelihood of returning as a teacher has ended. This has been a very difficult concept to accept because I loved teaching, loved being in the classroom and loved my students and their whānau.”
The tribunal noted Edmondson failed to address the conduct head on or express concern for her former students and colleagues.
Edmondson’s registration was cancelled and the former teacher was issued a formal censure. She was ordered to pay $3,255.87 towards the Complaints Assessment Committee’s costs and $582 to the Teaching Council.
‘I have let down so many people’
In a statement to Stuff, Edmondson said she had no choice but to accept the ruling, but regretted her actions.
“During a two-year period which covers this time I was suffering from extreme anxiety, I can’t explain why I did it other than self sabotage and treating myself badly for things that had happened. By the time it was reported, I really did not even remember and hadn’t done anything else.”
Her actions had impacted her children and her ability to provide for them.
“I can’t change what I have done, but can make sure it never happens again.”