Uncategorized
Argument breaks out at meeting of troubled West Coast council
Tensions boiled over between West Coast regional councillors today, when censured former chairperson Allan Birchfield tried to stay for a committee meeting.
Councillor Frank Dooley called on Resource Management Committee chairperson Brett Cummings to remove Birchfield from the meeting.
But Cummings, who is Birchfield’s close ally and a fellow goldminer, defended Birchfield’s right to stay. Cummings threatened to leave himself, saying he had had “a gutsful”.
West Coast Regional Council chief executive Darryl Lew called for the livestream recording of the meeting to be stopped. A short while later, the room was cleared of staff and members of the public.
It all unfolded just after the full council meeting for October had adjourned.
Before the Resource Management Committee was about to get under way, Dooley approached Birchfield with information about his analysis of the council rates debacle. That exchange seemed amicable enough.
The council is in the midst of an internal inquiry over its rates, after apologising last week for a potential mistake in the way rates invoices had been calculated, which led to some ratepayers being hit with 100 percent rate increases.
But earlier, under questioning from Birchfield, Dooley was challenged as chairperson of the Risk and Assurance Committee over the current rates mess facing the council.
The former chairperson, Birchfield, was censured and removed from all council committees on 8 August, after allegations over the leaking of confidential business.
As the committee meeting started this morning, Birchfield remained seated. That immediately drew the ire of Dooley, who said he was entitled to stay in the room, but not at the table due to his censure.
Cummings leapt to Birchfield’s defence: “He is still an elected member – I’m happy with it”.
Dooley: “Whether you are happy with it is irrelevant. He (Birchfield) has been suspended from council committees. This is a council committee meeting.”
Birchfield was entitled to stay in the room as an observer, but not as a councillor, council chairperson Peter Haddock said.
Birchfield responded that more than 3000 people had voted him onto the council a year ago and he believed he was legally entitled to remain.
“It’s not legal to exclude an elected member from any committee – I will just sit out here for the public part of the meeting,” Birchfield said.
A frustrated Dooley urged Cummings to “remove him from the table”.
Cummings stuck to his guns, however: “What difference does it make where he sits?”
Dooley: “He is suspended. You are the chairman of this committee, and you have an obligation to direct him (to leave).”
Cummings: “It’s not upsetting anyone else Frank – it’s upsetting you.”
Dooley doubled down, and asked Cummings if he was aware of the 8 August censure of Birchfield.
“I might just get up and get out of here,” Cummings replied.
“I have had a gutsful.”
At that point, the chief executive called the meeting to a halt, stopped the livestreaming on the internet and noted the media presence.
However, councillor Peter Ewen called “a point of order”.
“With respect to the chair, the chair makes the decision,” Ewen told Lew.
Lew persisted and asked the media and staff to leave.
A few minutes later, Birchfield exited the room with Cummings, who then returned to chair the meeting.
Immediately after the meeting, Birchfield told the Greymouth Star he had advice he was legally entitled to remain on all council committees.
It was mutually agreed with Cummings “out of respect for him” that it was better not to stay on today.
– Local Democracy Reporting is Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air
VIA RNZ
Analysis – Three years ago, Christopher Luxon headed into his first head-to-head debate with Chris Hipkins on the back of a poll that had National on 37 points and able to form a government with ACT alone.
Labour under then-Prime Minister Chris Hipkins was on a downward spiral on 27 percent in that same 1News-Verian poll and had no path to power.
Fast-forward three years and both parties headed into Tuesday night’s debate with two fresh new polls.
RNZ-Reid Research’s results had National on 26 percent and Labour on 31, while 1News-Verian had a much tighter race with just one point in it and both parties just under 30.
Those results spell early retirement and unemployment for a decent number of National Party MPs currently enjoying the government benches.
MMP has evolved so much in the past two elections that the combined Labour-National vote has gone from 81 percent at the 2017 election to just 57 in Tuesday’s RNZ-Reid Research poll.
So-called minor parties have grown in both size and influence, capturing the imagination of voters that traditionally voted blue or red.
Increasingly polling is suggesting another new party – Opportunity – has a good chance of making it into Parliament and being a potential kingmaker.
There’s now a very real possibility that the next government could be made up of four political parties.
That has happened before under Sir John Key’s National government in 2008, but because he chose to welcome the Māori Party into the fold, not because he had to.
The minor parties of 2026 have leverage and power going into any coalition talks well beyond any previous election years.
It makes a head-to-head between Christopher Luxon and Chris Hipkins far more redundant in this political age.
TVNZ/Harley Peters
They can’t fully commit to any of the promises they make because the slate is almost entirely wiped clean after 7 November when political parties sit down to discuss what a future government might look like.
Luxon has ruled out working with Opportunity after the election because of its land tax policy and National campaigning on no new taxes.
On Tuesday night he repeatedly refused to answer whether he would pick the phone up if he needed the party to be prime minister.
Instead, he repeated his previous comments about an untenable land tax, and then told reporters after the debate the question was a “hypothetical” that didn’t need an answer.
To be clear, that’s not a no.
At times in the debate the leaders could have been put in a time machine and transported back to three years ago, so similar were some of the issues and answers to them.
The cost of living crisis continued to be the overwhelming theme, a healthcare system under pressure and patients waiting too long in emergency departments hadn’t improved, and neither Chris had fully grasped the meaning of a yes or no question.
There was no big revelation or pledge – on the latter neither party has the headroom in their fiscal plans to do so.
It’s unlikely undecided voters watching were swayed one way or the other by the end of it.
That’s not to say the two Chrises performed badly.
They were both across their briefs, and while they had some nervous energy at the outset both settled into a comfortable rhythm and got their key messages across.
While Hipkins managed to land a few blows on Luxon over his failure to discipline New Zealand First’s Winston Peters and Shane Jones over racist remarks, Luxon in return made a strong argument on education and had Hipkins concede he had done what Labour couldn’t and got India across the line on a free trade agreement.
The biggest controversy of the night was the pair being asked to pick between the All Blacks and the Warriors with Luxon going Team ABs while Hipkins chose to “Up the Wahs”.
Both would have gone to bed happy with their performance and grateful they didn’t say or do anything they deeply regretted.
There is a week until they face-off again – another week of smiling at the cameras and hoping voters return them to the major party league.
rnz
Police say person who fired gun at officers still at large
New Zealand sides named for RLWC finals
Parliamentary Service working on extra chairs and offices for increased number of MPs
-
Latest News2 months ago‘Chilling’: Business groups speak out against National’s supermarket break-up plan
-
NZ News2 months agoTom Phillips report: The missed opportunities to find the children
-
Latest News2 months agoCars bearing Chinese police markings stir unease in Auckland
-
Politics2 months agoNational vows to try to split Pak’nSave and New World
-
Fiji News2 months agoPlans to have new Constitution by Dec 24th 2026
-
Latest News2 months agoFive Karangahape Road venues lose their liquor licences after police intervention
-
Politics2 months agoMBIE confirms botched biometric projects costs blown out to $50.7 million
-
NZ News2 months agoCop who stole $68,000 can now be named as champion Muay Thai fighter Haimona Tamati-Te Paki