Connect with us

HTML Image

i

Breaking News

Pro-Russia edits at RNZ may have been happening for years

Published

on

An RNZ digital journalist who allegedly inserted pro-Russian sentiment into news stories claims they have edited reports in that way for five years and nobody queried it.

The public broadcaster is launching a review after it said it found out on Friday that stories were being altered to give them a pro-Russian slant.

That was despite concerns being raised about the journalist’s work more than a year ago. They have now been placed on leave.

So far, 250 stories have been reviewed and 16 have had to be corrected.

RNZ management has conceded the broadcaster’s process for publishing stories from other media companies has not been strong enough, and there will be an external review of editorial processes.

“I subbed several stories that way over the past number of years,” the journalist told Checkpoint.

“In fact since I started RNZ and… I have done that for five years and nobody has tapped me on the shoulder and told me that I was doing anything wrong.”

Checkpoint reported that those claims had not yet been verified by the staff member’s managers.

An important distinction
RNZ chief executive and editor-in-chief Paul Thompson told Checkpoint, in response to the staff member’s claims that no issues were raised about editing for years, that those comments appeared to be about the staffer’s overall role as a sub-editor.

“The job of a sub-editor is to improve stories, add context, improve the journalism. What we’re talking about here is a very small proportion of stories where something quite different happened, where incorrect and misleading information was inserted into wire copy. So it’s important to make that distinction.”

Thompson described the altered copy as “pro-Kremlin garbage”.

“We’re feeling shocked and stunned and really, really challenged by this,” he told Checkpoint.

Thompson said there was an employment process underway in relation to the RNZ staff member.

“What’s happened is a serious breach of our editorial standards and personally, I’m just so gutted by it.

“We’ve let our audience down, and the Ukrainian community down, but I do need to make sure that we have a robust process because we’ve got enough challenges on our plate at the moment, I don’t want to compound that by getting ahead of a fair process.”

He said the audit had not yet found examples of inappropriate edits outside of Ukraine-Russia stories.

“I would point out that it is confined to one area… they’re still serious, I’m not diminishing it at all.

“We’ve done a really good look to make sure that we have a good feel for the range of the problems and I’m confident they’re confined to this one area.”

Thompson said senior staff from both the digital and wider news team were involved in the audit.

They were the right people for the job as they knew how the system worked, he said.

“What they’re doing is getting to the bottom of the audit and looking at every story and I’m confident in that process and it’s being done very well and very robustly,” Thompson said.

The independent review would look at robustness of processes around editing of stories for the website. The findings would be “very challenging” and they would be made public, he said.

“I think that is the best path to making sure any other issues are surfaced.”

In May 2022, serious concerns were raised about the same RNZ staff member’s work in a story written about Russia.

Thompson said the story received additional content and editing which met editorial standards.

“We did review the story at the time and … the story was changed to meet our editorial standards so our systems actually worked at the time.”

Thompson said the journalist was notified.

Thompson said he had not made any decisions yet on changing the editorial structure of RNZ as a result.

“I think that will be something I will be reflecting on and I’ll be looking to do anything which can make a positive difference, because we need to get to the bottom of this and we need to improve things.”

Thompson said he had not offered his resignation over the matter, nor had anyone else in management.

The independent review will report to the board and provide any advice to them.

Public confidence ‘eroded’
RNZ board chairperson Jim Mather told Checkpoint the actions of the staff member who inserted pro-Russian sentiment into web copy published on the RNZ website had “eroded” public confidence in the broadcaster.

He said he was extremely disappointed on behalf of the board. Mather said RNZ was a taonga, with 98 years of history as trusted public media.

“The role the board is going to take is we are going to appoint the panel of trusted individuals, experienced journalists, those that do have editorial experience to undertake the review. This is going to be done completely separate from the other work being undertaken by management,” he said.

They would leave “no stone unturned”.

“This is one of those times when the board needs to step up into this role, and we have undertaken that.” They would meet on Tuesday to decide the terms of reference.

Mather said the board maintained confidence in RNZ’s chief executive. He said the board was working closely with the chief executive to ensure a robust and transparent process was undertaken.

As for the story in 2022 which first attracted attention over its apparent lack of balance, Mather said it “should have given rise to measures being taken to ensure that highly topical issue was being closely monitored in terms of editorial standards”.

“I certainly have judgement about the systems that we have in place, and I am going to await the findings of the review in terms of the judgement of management around the whole issue”.

“But clearly at this point our systems are not adequate, or proven not to be adequate emphatically… it should raise questions about, why was this not identified at an earlier point in time?”

He said RNZ had a “massive challenge” ahead to win back the public’s confidence.

“We pride ourselves as having the highest standards of journalistic quality, so I can say it’s had a significant impact also on our journalism team. I think coming back from this issue is going to take a lot of work. Trust is… hard-fought and hard-earned, but easily lost.”

 

VIA RNZ

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Breaking News

Trump administration denounces CNN for airing Iranian leaders’ messages

Published

on

The Trump administration denounced CNN on Thursday (local time) for airing a portion of the new Iranian supreme leader’s public statement, the second time in three days the network has been targeted for reporting on how the regime is responding to the American attacks.

The attack illustrated the care news outlets must take in reporting during wartime, and the responsibilities of American journalists to report the perspective of countries its government views as enemies. It also exposed inconsistencies.

The message of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei during his first public statement since he succeeded his father, who was killed in an Israeli airstrike, was widely available elsewhere.

The White House said on social media that “fake news CNN just aired four straight minutes of uninterrupted Iranian state TV, run by the same psychotic and murderous regime that prided itself on brutally slaughtering Americans for 47 years”.

Earlier CNN interview criticised by Trump’s communications leader

Two days earlier, White House communications director Steven Cheung took issue with CNN anchor Erin Burnett’s interview with Hossein Mousavian, a former Iranian nuclear negotiator. Burnett asked Mousavian what he had been hearing about the Iranian government’s interest in having talks with the United States. There wasn’t much, he said.

“Ever notice how CNN just regurgitates quotes and unverified information from Iranian terrorists?” Cheung wrote on X.

“Total disgrace. They have become the murderous Iranian Regime’s version of Pravda,” he said, referring to the official newspaper of the former Soviet Union.

CNN did not address Cheung’s statement but did respond to the White House attack on Thursday. It noted that CNN, Sky News and Al Jazeera also showed portions of the ayatollah’s statement live.

“The world is watching with anticipation which direction this war will take,” CNN said. “Purported remarks from Iran’s new supreme leader are a critical component in helping audiences understand where this conflict is heading and were aired for their obvious news value.”

Other news outlets, including The Associated Press, sent out alerts on what Khamenei said. His vow to keep up attacks on other Arab countries in the region and plans to choke off the world’s oil supply were headlines.

Mojtaba Khamenei, the son of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, center, attends the annual Quds, or Jerusalem Day, rally in Tehran, Iran, May 31, 2019.

The New York Times led its website with a story on the speech in its immediate aftermath, later writing that the speech “was an early indication of how the new supreme leader would approach the war, as well as how he would lead the country”.

CNN has long been a favoured target of President Donald Trump, dating back to his first term. It’s a particularly vulnerable time for the network with Paramount Global’s agreement to purchase CNN’s parent company, Warner Bros Discovery, raising questions about its future editorial independence.

CNN showed a news anchor reading a portion of Khameini’s remarks in Farsi, with an English translation. It did not air them in full. After the speech, correspondent Nick Paton Walsh gave a debrief to anchor Kate Bolduan, noting how the non-appearance of the leader — reportedly injured in an air attack — was as important as what he said.

“We were waiting to see the face of the man to have proof of his health and survival,” Walsh said, “and they’ve not met that moment. Instead, a handwritten message, it seems, that mostly reiterates things we kind of already knew.”

A social media message board for Iran’s point of view

The Tech Transparency Project has reported that several Iranian leaders and institutions maintain verified accounts on X, formerly Twitter, owned by Trump ally Elon Musk. CNBC said Thursday that Khamenei has one of them, and an X account with his portrait posted the text of his remarks, available in Farsi and in an English translation.

Even though Khamenei’s father is dead, an account with his portrait was active on Thursday, mainly reposting messages from his son. “The revenge we have in mind is not just because of the martyrdom of the illustrious Leader of the Revolution,” read one message posted Thursday. “Every member of the nation martyred by the enemy is a separate case that demands we seek revenge.”

X is officially blocked in Iran, although many use a virtual private network to bypass restrictions. A message sent to the platform on Thursday was not immediately returned.

There’s a long history of journalists seeking interviews with world leaders, even when they are regarded as enemies of the United States. Most notable was 60 Minutes correspondent Mike Wallace’s interview with Iran’s Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979, when that country was holding Americans hostage.

Thursday’s remarks by Iran’s new supreme leader were absolutely newsworthy and legitimate for CNN to air them, said Jane Ferguson, a veteran international correspondent and founder of the journalism platform Noosphere. It’s not the job of government leaders to pick apart what CNN is reporting, she said.

“We’ve always faced this,” she said, about when reporters interview leaders or other figures hostile to American interests. “This has been a bit of low-hanging fruit for a while.”

Historian Douglas Brinkley of Rice University said that it’s unfair for CNN to be singled out in this instance. He, too, believes it is newsworthy to learn what leaders of an adversary are thinking, but it’s important to make sure that journalists are careful.

“You have to be leery of being used as a propaganda tool by the Iranian regime,” he said. “On the other hand, knowing what the enemy is saying and looking for a sign of a peace offering or a nuance is important … It’s a difficult balance.”

Continue Reading

Breaking News

University of Auckland building on fire

Published

on

A fire at the University of Auckland law school building has now been extinguished.

A Fire and Emergency spokesperson said there had been a fire at the University and six fire trucks were at the scene on Short Street. The call to 111 came through at about 2.40pm.

FENZ said the fire was now extinguished but crews will stay near the building this afternoon.

Staff and students were seen going in floor by floor, starting with level 6, to retrieve any belongings left behind

A student who was evacuated from the fourth floor of the building said it seemed the fire started on level two.

Police were at the scene talking to students who have been evacuated.

Student Talisha Lal said when the fire alarm went off she, and other students, thought it was a drill.

Lal said once she was out of the building, she could see smoke.

More to come…

~ RNZ 

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Teacher struck off after filming explicit videos at school

Published

on

An Auckland teacher has had her registration cancelled after recording explicit videos of herself urinating on the floor of a classroom and on a student’s belongings.

The New Zealand Teachers Disciplinary Tribunal found Lisa Marie Edmondson had committed serious misconduct.

The school was alerted to the content after the deputy principal of the school was approached by a member of the public who had come across a video on TikTok and recognised the setting. A search for the username led to a pornographic account.

The account contained more than 30 explicit videos which had been recorded at various locations over a period of two-and-a-half years.

In one of the videos, Edmondson appeared to urinate on the floor of a classroom with genitalia clearly visible. A second video showed the teacher urinating on a hat with a student’s name clearly visible in a lost property box.

The summary of facts stated there was an “ongoing urine smell” in some classrooms during the time of her employment which had been attributed to rats and mice. Bait stations had been set up during the school holidays but no rodent activity was noted. The tribunal said her students were “likely to have been adversely affected” due to evidence of an “unpleasant smell that required deep cleaning”.

While she was not visible in the videos, the teacher was recognised due to her voice and clothing.

Edmondson resigned in May 2023 after receiving notice of a formal investigation.

Following her resignation, Edmondson worked as a relief teacher at a second school before being invited to apply for a fixed-term position.

The tribunal found that Edmondson had failed to disclose her full employment history when applying for – and subsequently working at – a new school in 2023 and failing to inform her employer that she was the subject of a mandatory report and current investigation by the Teaching Council.

In her reflective statement, Edmondson acknowledged that she had let her students down and “was not the role model that I should have been for them”.

“I have accepted that the likelihood of returning as a teacher has ended. This has been a very difficult concept to accept because I loved teaching, loved being in the classroom and loved my students and their whānau.”

The tribunal noted Edmondson failed to address the conduct head on or express concern for her former students and colleagues.

Edmondson’s registration was cancelled and the former teacher was issued a formal censure. She was ordered to pay $3,255.87 towards the Complaints Assessment Committee’s costs and $582 to the Teaching Council.

‘I have let down so many people’

In a statement to Stuff, Edmondson said she had no choice but to accept the ruling, but regretted her actions.

“During a two-year period which covers this time I was suffering from extreme anxiety, I can’t explain why I did it other than self sabotage and treating myself badly for things that had happened. By the time it was reported, I really did not even remember and hadn’t done anything else.”

Her actions had impacted her children and her ability to provide for them.

“I can’t change what I have done, but can make sure it never happens again.”

~ RNZ

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 The Buzz: Powered by Apna Network Limited - Concept by Digital Hub NZ