Connect with us

HTML Image

i

NZ News

Mother of Marokopa children says Tom Phillips would take her phone to stop 111 calls

Published

on

For most people, the Tom Phillips case began when he first disappeared with his children into the bush in 2021 and ended when he was shot dead by police last year.

But for the children’s mother, Cat Christey, the saga stretches back many more years, through a volatile and sometimes violent relationship – and the nightmare she’s experienced continues.

In her first interview since her children were recovered from the bush, Cat told Mata Reports: “I would like to see anybody else endure what I have endured for all these years.

“People think that this started … when Thomas abducted the children the first time. This started long before that. This has been going on for a long, long time.”

‘There was no room for compromise’

As she still deals with agency meetings and the fallout from the dramatic end to Phillips’ time on the run, Cat has spoken out about the difficulties of her relationship with him and the toll it has taken.

“He was a good provider but very controlling. It was a very… imbalanced relationship. His views on what a marriage should be were different to my own. We should have been a team. But there was no room for compromise; it was his way or the highway.

“And he liked to be in control, he was a dictator.”

Cat Christey.
For most people, the Tom Phillips case began when he first disappeared with his children into the bush in 2021 and ended when he was shot dead by police last year – not for Cat Christey.

RNZ / MATA

Phillips first took the couple’s three children into the bush near Marokopa in the western Waikato in September 2021 without telling Cat where he was going. They were separated at the time.

He returned several weeks later, but then, in December 2021, he went bush with the children again.

Phillips remained a fugitive until he was killed in a shoot-out with police following a ram-raid in Piopio.

Cat says that during their relationship, Phillips “wasn’t extremely violent” although she described slaps and how he once strangled her.

But she was more concerned about his psychological abuse.

“He would control all the finances, he would take vehicle keys away from me … he would control who I saw and when I saw them.”

Marokopa.
Cat describes a volatile and sometimes violent relationship.

RNZ / MATA

A fascination with guns

She says Phillips had a fascination with guns and that at one point, she twice rang 111 to tell the police about it. However, she says, Phillips took the phone off her and hung up both times. “I truly believed police would show up because it was a 111 call … but police did not come.”

Phillips ordered her out of the house after that incident. Although he later begged her to come back, Cat says she wouldn’t.

A few days later, he began proceedings against her and the situation spiralled over the next few years.

Cat Christey.
Cat says Tom Phillips had a fascination with guns.

RNZ / MATA

Cat found out about the shooting and the discovery of her children after police had first told a Netflix documentary crew – a documentary she says she told the officer in charge, Detective Inspector Andrew Saunders, that she objected to.

“I was dead set against it when they first told me. It was very blunt and I said they do not have my permission.

“[Saunders] told me they didn’t need my permission, that they were just letting me know.”

Cat Christey.
Cat says she objected to a Netflix documentary about the case.

RNZ / MATA

Not a victim

It’s one way in which she says she feels like she has been disregarded by police throughout the case.

For instance she says that she only found out through the media about the fact the police had decided not to charge anyone with assisting Phillips while he was on the run and that the case was no longer being actively investigated.

Also, she says, she was declined support for counselling because she was not considered a victim of crime.

“I had reached out to Victim Support … in the hopes that they might be able to assist with some sessions with my psychologist.”

Marokopa.
Cat feels like she has been disregarded by police throughout the case.

RNZ / MATA

Cat says Victim Support spoke to the police about her situation but was told nothing could be done.

“Police refused to do a referral stating that we’re not victims of crime.” This was because what had happened to her was not considered domestic violence, a point disputed by Auckland University associate professor of law Carrie Leonetti.

“This abduction, I think, was an act of child abuse, but it was also an act of domestic violence against these children’s mother,” says Leonetti.

“Taking children and saying, ‘You will not see them for three years, they will live or die depending on what I decide’ is an act of domestic violence.”

Cat Christey.
Cat was told Victim Support spoke to the police about her situation but was told nothing could be done.

RNZ / MATA

Even Police Minister Mark Mitchell, who would not comment specifically about police actions, said he personally believed Cat was a victim.

“Any right-minded person would say that a mother, regardless of the circumstances, when they’re separated from their children, and they’ve been through the tragedy that we all saw unfold in front of the country, a lot of people would probably consider her as much a victim in terms of what has happened,” Mitchell told Mata.

“But I cannot talk to the police response other than saying, in my experience, police are very, very good at making sure they identify, communicate and support [victims] as much as they can.”

Cat Christey.
Police Minister Mark Mitchell said he personally believed Cat was a victim.

RNZ / MATA

Agencies respond

In response to questions from Mata Reports about Cat’s treatment and allegations, Detective Inspector Ross McKay said: “A number of the matters you are asking about are subject to the government inquiry into the disappearance of the Phillips children, and it would therefore be inappropriate for us to comment at this time.”

A spokesperson for Manaaki Tāngata Victim Support said the organisation could not comment on individual cases, but added: “The Victims Assistance Scheme, which Victim Support administers on behalf of the Ministry of Justice, has specific eligibility criteria.

“Our Support Workers carefully consider each person’s circumstances and identify the support available to them.”

A pair of gumboots.
A public inquiry was tasked with considering whether government agencies took all practicable steps to protect the welfare and safety of the children.

RNZ / MATA

A public inquiry into the disappearance of Phillips and his children has been delivered to Attorney-General Chris Bishop.

The inquiry, led by the Honourable Simon Moore KC, was set up under the orders of the previous Attorney-General, Judith Collins, and tasked with considering whether government agencies took all practicable steps to protect the welfare and safety of the children.

Bishop says the report will be presented to Parliament once the government has considered the recommendations and how to deal with suppression orders that are in place in the High Court and Family Court.

Made with the help of Te Māngai Pāho and NZ on Air.

Source: RNZ

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Pieces still missing from Tom Phillips inquiry – academic

Published

on

An expert on family violence says it is indefensible Family Court proceedings were excluded from the government’s inquiry into the Tom Phillips case.

She says the government should be looking at reinstating protective mechanisms that were stripped out of the Care of Children Act in 2014, and she is “a little sympathetic” to police, with a caveat that she doesn’t usually say that.

“It’s just really hard for me to know whether we should be stringing them up by their toenails or not when we just don’t know what came out of the Family Court.”

Phillips was shot dead by police a year ago, after nearly four years on the run with his children.

Government ministers apologised on Tuesday after the damning inquiry found multiple failings by authorities including information sharing and following up certain leads.

Oranga Tamariki and police have admitted errors, although police dispute the inquiry’s finding that agencies working together could have prevented the children’s disappearance or brought them back sooner.

University of Auckland associate law professor Carrie Leonetti told RNZ the principal judge of the Family Court court could have opened its files to the inquiry, and although such files would be sensitive they could have been redacted from public view.

“The inquiry starts four years too late,” she said.

“Tom Phillips had court ordered care of the children from 2019 at least, and was given court ordered care of the children back, it appears, in October 2021 after the first abduction.

“The inquiry makes very clear that Oranga Tamariki had… very limited involvement with Tom Phillips and the children before 2021… we’re starting the movie half-way through.”

Leonetti said the children’s mother’s concerns were not taken seriously partly because of her Family Court dispute with Phillips.

“It’s pretty clear that these agencies brushed her concerns off … It’s well established in the social science literature that there’s just this pervasive societal myth that women fabricate claims of domestic violence for some kind of tactical purpose in custody proceedings.

“And I think it’s even worse for the Phillips kids’ mother because she’s Māori… a Māori woman trying to get the police and Oranga Tamariki to take her Pākehā ex-husband’s threat to their children seriously.

“He made threats to her at the time of their separation in 2017 that he was going to take the kids and not let her see them again, and he he made those threats to third parties that he was going to take off with the kids and go bush.”

She said there was a “weird sort of hot potato problem”, where police, Oranga Tamariki and the Family Court would defer responsibility for a case to whichever of the three was approached first.

“If people go first to the Family Court and they award care to the person, then I think Oranga Tamariki and the police say to themselves, ‘well, how dangerous can he be?'”

She said the report seemed to indicate police and Oranga Tamariki had made errors in the investigation or passing on information, but without the details from the Family Court “it’s like we’re looking at this mosaic with half of it blacked out”.

Phillips may never have had unsupervised care of the children in 2019 and 2021 had the “Bristol clauses” that required courts to ensure a child’s safety before granting custody in domestic violence-related cases not been scrapped under the John Key government in 2014.

“You go to Family Court, you lose custody of your kids to the perpetrator. You go to the police, they seem to write a lot of reports but not take a lot of action. You go to Oranga Tamariki and they roll your eyes and think you’re a disgrunted ex-wife.”

However, she said police may be right to say the situation may not have ended differently “if they had done everything right, but the Family Court and Oranga Tamariki still failed”.

“We actually need all of these agencies to get it right as often as possible to have an appropriate safety net.”

rnz

Continue Reading

Latest News

Police supporting families of New Zealanders missing in Nepal floods

Published

on

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade says police are supporting the families of five New Zealanders who remain missing after August’s catastrophic flash flood at the Nepal-China border.

A massive flash flood, believed to have been triggered by a glacial collapse, tore through a Himalayan valley on 26 August, burying villages.

The disaster killed more than 1300 people, with at least 5000 others unaccounted for, according to latest reports on both sides of the border.

In New Zealand, community groups have raised more than $200,000 for the flood victims, according to former honorary consul for Nepal Dinesh Khadka.

“I’m so proud of the Indian community here who … supported us, saying it is not a Nepal problem but our problem,” Khadka said.

He said about 80 percent of the donations had come from New Zealand’s Indian community.

A fundraising dinner was organised by the New Zealand Nepal Society at the Freemans Bay Community Centre in Auckland last week.
A fundraising dinner was organised by the New Zealand Nepal Society at the Freemans Bay Community Centre in Auckland last week.

Supplied

Last week, the Nepali community raised $100,000 through a fundraising dinner at the Freemans Bay Community Centre in Auckland.

The Central Sikh Association donated $50,000 to Nepal that same night.

Earlier this month, Gurdwara Shri Dashmesh Darbaar Sahib in Papatoetoe pledged $15,000, which was matched by the New Zealand Indian Central Association.

Shiv Mandir in Manurewa donated $4000, while Manurewa Local Board member Marshal Ahluwalia and National Party Manurewa candidate Ghouse Majeed donated $7500.

Khadka said the Federation of Islamic Associations of New Zealand had pledged $5000, which would be directly deposited into Nepal’s Prime Minister’s Disaster Relief Fund.

Other fundraising events included a dosa event in Māngere organised by Thiru Subramaniyar Aalayam on 5 September, and a fundraising dinner organised by the Nepal-New Zealand Friendship Society of Canterbury in Rolleston on 12 September.

A similar dinner was organised by the Waikato Indian Association and Nepal-New Zealand Waikato Friendship Society in Hamilton on 9 September, while the Taranaki Nepalese Community is planning a fundraising dinner in New Plymouth on 26 September.

He said the fundraising was a temporary effort to support people who had lost everything in the floods.

“Nepal will take decades to rebuild and whatever we raise now will go to the people who are in most need right now,” he said.

Khadka said more fundraising events were being planned across New Zealand.

Next week, Wellington Mutamizh Sangam’s youth wing will hold a youth festival to raise funds for Nepal, while the Indian Film Festival in October has also pledged to support fundraising efforts for the country, with a Nepali film included in its programme.

Khadka said the response had shown him how much New Zealanders cared about Nepal.

“Wherever we go, I see New Zealanders approaching me and asking how they can support Nepal,” he said.

“That makes me proud of New Zealand and how lucky we are to be called New Zealanders.”

Khadka also warned that some organisations were using the disaster to make money.

“It is very sad to see that there are organisations who are raising money but it doesn’t reach the Prime Minister’s Disaster Relief Fund, so my request to people who are donating their hard-earned money is to make sure that you donate through the right channels,” he said.

Dinesh Khadka is leading the fundraising for Nepal flood victims in New Zealand.
Dinesh Khadka is leading fundraising efforts for Nepal flood victims in New Zealand.

Supplied

Khadka said he was receiving regular updates from Nepal Police, who were doing their best to recover bodies and search for survivors.

“More than 1400 bodies [have] already [been] found but they’re looking through the rubble and buildings to find more than 5000 bodies or even survivors,” he said.

Khadka said he did not have an update on the missing New Zealanders.

Five New Zealanders remain missing following the deadly flash floods: Dejan Kuzmic, Shweta Mhatre, Mihir Patel, Kinnari Patel and Suhasini Reddy.

More than 300 foreign nationals have been rescued, according to an update from Nepal’s National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority.

No New Zealanders have been included in that number.

RNZ understands Mhatre and Kuzmic were part of the Isha Foundation’s pilgrimage, and Sadhguru had previously said two New Zealanders were missing from his trekking group.

Meanwhile, Reddy’s family has called on rescuers not to stop searching for the 44-year-old after conflicting reports about her status emerged online.

Reddy’s brother Rajeev and his wife Lauren urged people to keep searching for survivors in a Facebook post several weeks ago.

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said New Zealand’s consular response team in Kathmandu was engaged with local authorities and the Nepalese Government.

“However, challenges on the ground mean that new, verified information will continue to take time to emerge.”

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said New Zealand had extended an offer of technical expertise to aid Nepal’s response effort in addition to humanitarian assistance worth $3.5 million to support the humanitarian response.

rnz

Continue Reading

NZ News

Woman told police she had Tom Phillips in her car in May 2023 – but officers were diverted

Published

on

A credible sighting of Tom Phillips in May 2023 was not investigated properly by police as they were diverted to another incident, and police inaction led to avoidable delays, a report has found.

A woman was approached by who she thought was Phillips on 28 May 2023 for help jump starting his car near Te Anga Road. She drove him there, took a photo of him, and sighted his children.

A damning inquiry has found authorities could have prevented Phillips from disappearing with his children – or brought them home sooner.

The report released on Tuesday afternoon said agencies missed crucial chances to protect the children and repeatedly downplayed the harm they faced.

The woman called the police after the sighting and described him as Caucasian, in his late 30s to early 40s. She said he was wearing a black hat, black/grey shirt, black jeans, and work boots.

The man police believe to be Tom Phillips, sighted at Bunnings in Te Rapa
A Tom Phillips sighting.

NZ Police

She said that he smelled strongly and like someone who had not had a shower in a very long time.

She also expressed her concern about the man and the children because they seemed to be stuck in the middle of nowhere on a forestry road. Her and her mother-in-law suspected it was Phillips.

Following the report, police dispatched a unit about half an hour after receiving the call, but that unit was diverted to a family harm incident shortly after at a different address on Te Anga Road. The report noted family harm incidents were usually given priority.

Not long after that, the unit advised no further action was required from police.

There was a brief follow up after this, by an “astute senior constable” but what followed was a “series of unfortunate mis-steps and circumstances” that together “conspired to compound the delay in police properly appreciating and investigating the significance” of the sighting.

There is no evidence that the first unit tasked with the report visited the woman’s home or attempted to visit the location of the sighting. Police have not been able to explain to the inquiry why it was designated as no further action required, without any follow up.

Regarding the 28 May 2023 sighting, the inquiry found police inaction on the day led to avoidable delays.

It said police should have recognised the sighting was credible, and investigated “more thoroughly and in a more timely way,” and had there been no delay, “there might have been a real prospect of locating the children”.

Source: RNZ

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 The Buzz: Powered by Apna Network Limited - Concept by Digital Hub NZ