For most people, the Tom Phillips case began when he first disappeared with his children into the bush in 2021 and ended when he was shot dead by police last year.
But for the children’s mother, Cat Christey, the saga stretches back many more years, through a volatile and sometimes violent relationship – and the nightmare she’s experienced continues.
In her first interview since her children were recovered from the bush, Cat told Mata Reports: “I would like to see anybody else endure what I have endured for all these years.
“People think that this started … when Thomas abducted the children the first time. This started long before that. This has been going on for a long, long time.”
‘There was no room for compromise’
As she still deals with agency meetings and the fallout from the dramatic end to Phillips’ time on the run, Cat has spoken out about the difficulties of her relationship with him and the toll it has taken.
“He was a good provider but very controlling. It was a very… imbalanced relationship. His views on what a marriage should be were different to my own. We should have been a team. But there was no room for compromise; it was his way or the highway.
“And he liked to be in control, he was a dictator.”
For most people, the Tom Phillips case began when he first disappeared with his children into the bush in 2021 and ended when he was shot dead by police last year – not for Cat Christey.
RNZ / MATA
Phillips first took the couple’s three children into the bush near Marokopa in the western Waikato in September 2021 without telling Cat where he was going. They were separated at the time.
He returned several weeks later, but then, in December 2021, he went bush with the children again.
Phillips remained a fugitive until he was killed in a shoot-out with police following a ram-raid in Piopio.
Cat says that during their relationship, Phillips “wasn’t extremely violent” although she described slaps and how he once strangled her.
But she was more concerned about his psychological abuse.
“He would control all the finances, he would take vehicle keys away from me … he would control who I saw and when I saw them.”
Cat describes a volatile and sometimes violent relationship.
RNZ / MATA
A fascination with guns
She says Phillips had a fascination with guns and that at one point, she twice rang 111 to tell the police about it. However, she says, Phillips took the phone off her and hung up both times. “I truly believed police would show up because it was a 111 call … but police did not come.”
Phillips ordered her out of the house after that incident. Although he later begged her to come back, Cat says she wouldn’t.
A few days later, he began proceedings against her and the situation spiralled over the next few years.
Cat says Tom Phillips had a fascination with guns.
RNZ / MATA
Cat found out about the shooting and the discovery of her children after police had first told a Netflix documentary crew – a documentary she says she told the officer in charge, Detective Inspector Andrew Saunders, that she objected to.
“I was dead set against it when they first told me. It was very blunt and I said they do not have my permission.
“[Saunders] told me they didn’t need my permission, that they were just letting me know.”
Cat says she objected to a Netflix documentary about the case.
RNZ / MATA
Not a victim
It’s one way in which she says she feels like she has been disregarded by police throughout the case.
For instance she says that she only found out through the media about the fact the police had decided not to charge anyone with assisting Phillips while he was on the run and that the case was no longer being actively investigated.
Also, she says, she was declined support for counselling because she was not considered a victim of crime.
“I had reached out to Victim Support … in the hopes that they might be able to assist with some sessions with my psychologist.”
Cat feels like she has been disregarded by police throughout the case.
RNZ / MATA
Cat says Victim Support spoke to the police about her situation but was told nothing could be done.
“Police refused to do a referral stating that we’re not victims of crime.” This was because what had happened to her was not considered domestic violence, a point disputed by Auckland University associate professor of law Carrie Leonetti.
“This abduction, I think, was an act of child abuse, but it was also an act of domestic violence against these children’s mother,” says Leonetti.
“Taking children and saying, ‘You will not see them for three years, they will live or die depending on what I decide’ is an act of domestic violence.”
Cat was told Victim Support spoke to the police about her situation but was told nothing could be done.
RNZ / MATA
Even Police Minister Mark Mitchell, who would not comment specifically about police actions, said he personally believed Cat was a victim.
“Any right-minded person would say that a mother, regardless of the circumstances, when they’re separated from their children, and they’ve been through the tragedy that we all saw unfold in front of the country, a lot of people would probably consider her as much a victim in terms of what has happened,” Mitchell told Mata.
“But I cannot talk to the police response other than saying, in my experience, police are very, very good at making sure they identify, communicate and support [victims] as much as they can.”
Police Minister Mark Mitchell said he personally believed Cat was a victim.
RNZ / MATA
Agencies respond
In response to questions from Mata Reports about Cat’s treatment and allegations, Detective Inspector Ross McKay said: “A number of the matters you are asking about are subject to the government inquiry into the disappearance of the Phillips children, and it would therefore be inappropriate for us to comment at this time.”
A spokesperson for Manaaki Tāngata Victim Support said the organisation could not comment on individual cases, but added: “The Victims Assistance Scheme, which Victim Support administers on behalf of the Ministry of Justice, has specific eligibility criteria.
“Our Support Workers carefully consider each person’s circumstances and identify the support available to them.”
A public inquiry was tasked with considering whether government agencies took all practicable steps to protect the welfare and safety of the children.
RNZ / MATA
A public inquiry into the disappearance of Phillips and his children has been delivered to Attorney-General Chris Bishop.
The inquiry, led by the Honourable Simon Moore KC, was set up under the orders of the previous Attorney-General, Judith Collins, and tasked with considering whether government agencies took all practicable steps to protect the welfare and safety of the children.
Bishop says the report will be presented to Parliament once the government has considered the recommendations and how to deal with suppression orders that are in place in the High Court and Family Court.
Made with the help of Te Māngai Pāho and NZ on Air.
Police say a person who fired a gun at officers in Napier is still at large.
Eastern District Commander Superintendent Joel Lamb said Police tried to stop a vehicle in the Pirimai Area at about 10pm on Tuesday.
He said someone in the back seat pointed what was presumed to be a firearm at officers pursuing the vehicle.
“Staff have then heard two distinct gunshots as the firearm was discharged.
“Fortunately, neither of our officers were injured, and the patrol vehicle did not sustain any damage.”
He said hours later, the vehicle was seen travelling north on the Waikato Expressway towards Auckland.
Police seized the vehicle at an address in Manurewa, but they had not found the alleged offender.
Lamb said people who lived at the Manurewa address were engaging with Police.
He said Eastern District and Counties Manukau Police were making enquiries.
“Presenting a firearm at a Police officer is a serious escalation that puts our staff and the wider community at risk. This behaviour is entirely unacceptable.
“We are taking this incident extremely seriously and will be pursuing all lines of enquiry to locate the offender and hold them accountable.”
Police asked anyone who witnessed the incident to contact Police on 105 or online using the reference number 261111/3764.
Information could also be provided anonymously via Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111.
The players tasked with ending Australia’s Rugby League World Cup dominance have been named.
The Kiwis and Kiwi Ferns have announced their squads for this Sunday’s World Cup finals in Brisbane.
Both sides are chasing their first titles since 2008, and both are looking to end their opponents run of three crowns in a row.
“Our Kiwi Ferns have been so dominant in years gone by, and we want to bring dominance back to this jersey, so I think it will be a case of who wants it more,” said co-captain Georgia Hale of the impending clash.
The Kiwis get a major boost for the final as they welcome back Ronaldo Mulitalo after he served a one-match ban for a high tackle against Fiji Bati.
Mulitalo replaces Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad, who moves to the six-man bench, which again includes utility Te Maire Martin, middle forwards Naufahu Whyte, Erin Clark and Xavier Willison plus fullback Keano Kini.
Loose forward Joseph Tapine will make his 30th Test appearance in a familiar pack again, including second-rowers Isaiah Papali’i and Briton Nikora, and props James Fisher-Harris and Moses Leota.
Winger Jamayne Isaako is on the cusp of claiming the New Zealand record for most Test points.
His five goals against Tonga lifted his career points tally to 225 – level with Shaun Johnson – while centre Casey McLean goes into the final with 16 tries in just eight Tests.
Fisher-Harris will again captain the team.
Fullback Ponga said the goal of the group was clear.
“We have high expectations around what we want to achieve, and obviously winning a world Cup is one of them.”
Meanwhile, Ricky Henry has selected a settled side to take on the Jillaroos, led by their lethal centre combination of Stacey Waaka and Mele Hufanga.
Veteran Apii Nicholls takes the number one jersey, Leianne Tufuga and Mackenzie Wiki on the wings.
Henry has stuck with his halves pairing of Chantay Kiria-Ratu and Raecene McGregor with Alexis Tauaneai, Georgia Hale and Otesa Pule up front.
Rounding out the starting pack is Shaniece Monschau, Kaiyah Atai, and Angelina Teakaraanga-Katoa.
“We have been building well throughout the tournament; we understand the Jillaroos side, and will give it our all to make New Zealand proud this weekend,” said Henry.
Multiple opportunities to identify and mitigate a multi-million-dollar budget blowout at RNZ appear have been missed, according to the former executive director at Audit New Zealand.
The public broadcaster on Monday revealed a near $12 million shock financial loss after a litany of financial blunders, which will now lead to sweeping job cuts.
The $11.8m loss is more than 25 times the $470,000 RNZ had expected to lose over the year to June.
CEO Paul Thompson took responsibility for the result, and said internal reports gave an inaccurate picture of the finances, meaning the scale of the loss only became clear in October.
RNZ’s former chief financial officer Hilary Parker resigned unexpectedly in early October.
The board said it would commission an independent review into what went wrong.
Independent contractor Stephen Walker, who left the Audit Office earlier this year, said the size of the loss was surprising, as was the length of time it took to identify it – months after the financial year ended.
Independent contractor Stephen Walker is a former executive director at Audit New Zealand.
Supplied / OAG
“Probably more of a concern is that they had seemingly been unaware that they were running up a significant deficit until they were in the preparation stage of their annual report in October.”
Walker said public entities typically produced monthly financial reports.
An interim audit also took place before the end of the financial year, he said, but if the organisation hadn’t identified significant losses at that stage, the auditor could also be in the dark.
“It seems that there’s a real weakness in forecasting and budgeting that’s occurred here and that the monthly accounts, when they’re produced, either haven’t identified these significant variances against budget or the magnitude of them really hasn’t come to light until right towards the end of the financial year,” Walker said.
“And really at that point, there’s no opportunity for the chief executive, the leadership team to take, and the board to take, any corrective action because the year has effectively been completed.”
Walker said the “significant miss” was difficult to account for given it was more than 10 percent of RNZ’s total funding.
He said based on RNZ’s annual report, financial complexity didn’t appear to be a factor.
“This $11.8m loss isn’t made up of one particular item … it seems to have been contributed to by a number of separate expense lines running over budget. So I don’t think it’s necessarily to do with complexity.”
Among the errors, RNZ wrongly counted $2m from land sales as income in its budget. Staff costs also came in $3.2m over budget, including $1.4m in redundancy payments.
Professor at Auckland University’s business school Norman Wong said based on media reports the issues identified were “significant and troubling”.
Norman Wong.
Supplied / University of Auckland
“But recognising the sale of land as income in their budget is a basic error that one would have expected to have been caught and corrected well before it got to this point.”
With funding reductions at RNZ over the past two years, Walker expected greater scrutiny of financial results.
“Virtually every public entity has had their annual budget reduced. And so you would expect … the leadership team on a monthly basis and board – I’m not sure how frequently the board will consider the information – but you would expect them to be interrogating the results on a regular basis throughout the year,” he said.
Walker said initiating an independent review was the correct course of action and that he’d want to understand what information the leadership team and the board were regularly receiving.
He said he’d “love to say” surprising financial results were rare, but conceded they occured on a semi-frequent basis during his time leading the Audit Office.
“The benefit of independent scrutiny by the Audit Office – and the auditors providing that support to the Auditor General – [is] that the reporting is fairly presented at the end of the year, whether it’s good, bad or ugly.”