National has pledged to extend paid parental leave from 26 weeks to 30, if re-elected.
The party is also proposing to revive a policy that allows parents to take some or all of their leave at the same time.
Since 2020, primary carers have been eligible for 26 weeks of paid leave and an additional 26 weeks of unpaid leave.
National has proposed changing the entitlement incrementally, increasing it to 27 weeks in 2027, 28 weeks in 2028, and then 30 weeks in 2029.
Finance spokesperson Nicola Willis said the policy modernised paid parental leave, supporting families to give them more financial breathing space while they took on caregiving responsibilities.
“The birth of a child is an expensive time, as families juggle the costs that come with a new baby while their household income is less than when both parents are in paid work,” she said.
Nicola Willis at the announcement on Sunday.
TU NATANAHIRA / RNZ
“Extending paid parental leave to 30 weeks will ease that pressure and give more parents the option to stay home with their baby for longer.”
Leave is currently capped at $811 a week. National’s policy did not propose an increase to that, but Willis said the government had increased the cap each year.
National is also bringing back a previous policy that would allow parents to split their leave.
Christopher Luxon speaking to a child at the announcement.
TU NATANAHIRA / RNZ
The party used an example of instead of one parent taking 30 weeks’ leave, both parents could take 15 weeks together, or both parents could take 4 weeks together, then one parent could take 10 weeks, and then the other parent could take 12 weeks.
Willis said the current law was restrictive and got in the way of families doing what they thought was best for their babies.
“Whether a dad wants to support mum in the first few weeks after birth, or two caregivers want to share paid leave in overlapping instalments, the choice should sit with families and not restricted by outdated government rules.”
The policy would be funded out of Budget operating allowances, costing $27 million in 2027/28, $56.6m in 2028/29, and $119m in 2029/30.
That larger extension is timed to coincide with the forecast return to surplus.
National claims its long-term intention is to increase the entitlement to 40 weeks, but it has not put a timeframe on when it would want to achieve this.
The Napier MP’s would-be challenger, Stuart Nash, resigned as a New Zealand First candidate, after coming under fire for labelling Nimon as lazy for taking nine months off after having a baby.
MPs do not get paid parental leave. Nimon confirmed she took ten weeks of parental leave and returned to Parliament after six months.
Nimon, who was present at the press conference, said Nash called her on Thursday to apologise.
“He just offered his apology for offending me,” she said.
The party insisted it had not timed the announcement off the back of the saga, but Nimon said her views on the policy would be the same regardless of recent events.
“I’ve said a lot this week, there is no right way of being a working parent. We just need to give people the choice. This policy that we’re putting forward is really going to give people that choice. I stand by that, whether what happened this week happened or not.”
In 2023, Willis proposed allowing parents to share their leave entitlement so they could take time off together. The member’s bill was voted down by Labour at first reading.
National had put forward a member’s bill this term to allow for split parental leave, in the name of East Coast MP Dana Kirkpatrick.
It had been unable to get the changes into the coalition agreement or pass them as a government this term. Willis said the responsibility for parental leave rested with the Workplace Relations and Safety Minister, ACT’s Brooke van Velden.
“I think it’s a shame that it wasn’t prioritised within the minister’s programme for this term, and we are really keen as a National Party to see this done.”
ACT leader David Seymour defended his colleague, saying van Velden had not worked on parental leave flexibility because she had not been asked to.
“She hasn’t been asked by the National Party to do that. It’s not in their coalition documents. They didn’t try and negotiate it into their agreement. I was disappointed because I think people want to see the coalition pointing to what it’s achieved rather than pointing fingers at each other.”
Seymour said the timing of the announcement felt political, given the events of the past week.
Labour leader Chris Hipkins asked why National should be trusted now.
“They have had three years to make life easier for Kiwis and support families, but have instead cut Best Start support for parents, reduced funding for school lunches, cut women’s pay, and failed to tackle the cost of living.”
Hipkins said Labour would have a “comprehensive” paid parental leave policy, which it would set out in due course.
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson said National’s policy was too little, too late.
“The only time that government cares about women is when it is polling low. We have seen them trash the lives of women, whether it’s through cancelling pay equity claims for hundreds of thousands of women, whether it’s in keeping wage growth low, because that impacts disproportionately women. This government made decisions to keep one in seven children in poverty. That is, children and their mothers.”
Last month, National announced a policy to continue paying the government KiwiSaver contribution to people on paid parental leave.
Some parents online called National’s promise to extend paid parental leave a “lolly scramble”.
Many questioned why National would wait until after an election to implement much needed help, and more said the policy was not enough.
A few commenters on Facebook suggested that increasing the payments rather than the length of the leave would help families more.
A couple said they had had to go to work earlier because they could not afford to live on PPL payments.
Lisa, Wellington mum of a two-and-a-half-year old, said the policy was a step in the right direction but was missing the bigger issue: the cost of early childhood education (ECE).
“I know parents that are paying upwards of $1500 a fortnight for two children just to keep their jobs, or else they’re just opting to leave their careers,” she said.
She said help with childcare costs would have left her better off financially than more time off work.
“We constantly hear Christopher Luxon saying he wants to get people back to work, but you’re getting people back to work who are then having to spend half their salary on ECE fees just so they can go to work. It’s just this awful cycle.”
She said the high fees were also keeping people from having more children.
Instead, Lisa cited Norway, where childcare costs are capped, as a better model.
An expert on family violence says it is indefensible Family Court proceedings were excluded from the government’s inquiry into the Tom Phillips case.
She says the government should be looking at reinstating protective mechanisms that were stripped out of the Care of Children Act in 2014, and she is “a little sympathetic” to police, with a caveat that she doesn’t usually say that.
“It’s just really hard for me to know whether we should be stringing them up by their toenails or not when we just don’t know what came out of the Family Court.”
Phillips was shot dead by police a year ago, after nearly four years on the run with his children.
Government ministers apologised on Tuesday after the damning inquiry found multiple failings by authorities including information sharing and following up certain leads.
Oranga Tamariki and police have admitted errors, although police dispute the inquiry’s finding that agencies working together could have prevented the children’s disappearance or brought them back sooner.
University of Auckland associate law professor Carrie Leonetti told RNZ the principal judge of the Family Court court could have opened its files to the inquiry, and although such files would be sensitive they could have been redacted from public view.
“The inquiry starts four years too late,” she said.
“Tom Phillips had court ordered care of the children from 2019 at least, and was given court ordered care of the children back, it appears, in October 2021 after the first abduction.
“The inquiry makes very clear that Oranga Tamariki had… very limited involvement with Tom Phillips and the children before 2021… we’re starting the movie half-way through.”
Leonetti said the children’s mother’s concerns were not taken seriously partly because of her Family Court dispute with Phillips.
“It’s pretty clear that these agencies brushed her concerns off … It’s well established in the social science literature that there’s just this pervasive societal myth that women fabricate claims of domestic violence for some kind of tactical purpose in custody proceedings.
“And I think it’s even worse for the Phillips kids’ mother because she’s Māori… a Māori woman trying to get the police and Oranga Tamariki to take her Pākehā ex-husband’s threat to their children seriously.
“He made threats to her at the time of their separation in 2017 that he was going to take the kids and not let her see them again, and he he made those threats to third parties that he was going to take off with the kids and go bush.”
She said there was a “weird sort of hot potato problem”, where police, Oranga Tamariki and the Family Court would defer responsibility for a case to whichever of the three was approached first.
“If people go first to the Family Court and they award care to the person, then I think Oranga Tamariki and the police say to themselves, ‘well, how dangerous can he be?'”
She said the report seemed to indicate police and Oranga Tamariki had made errors in the investigation or passing on information, but without the details from the Family Court “it’s like we’re looking at this mosaic with half of it blacked out”.
Phillips may never have had unsupervised care of the children in 2019 and 2021 had the “Bristol clauses” that required courts to ensure a child’s safety before granting custody in domestic violence-related cases not been scrapped under the John Key government in 2014.
“You go to Family Court, you lose custody of your kids to the perpetrator. You go to the police, they seem to write a lot of reports but not take a lot of action. You go to Oranga Tamariki and they roll your eyes and think you’re a disgrunted ex-wife.”
However, she said police may be right to say the situation may not have ended differently “if they had done everything right, but the Family Court and Oranga Tamariki still failed”.
“We actually need all of these agencies to get it right as often as possible to have an appropriate safety net.”
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade says police are supporting the families of five New Zealanders who remain missing after August’s catastrophic flash flood at the Nepal-China border.
A massive flash flood, believed to have been triggered by a glacial collapse, tore through a Himalayan valley on 26 August, burying villages.
The disaster killed more than 1300 people, with at least 5000 others unaccounted for, according to latest reports on both sides of the border.
In New Zealand, community groups have raised more than $200,000 for the flood victims, according to former honorary consul for Nepal Dinesh Khadka.
“I’m so proud of the Indian community here who … supported us, saying it is not a Nepal problem but our problem,” Khadka said.
He said about 80 percent of the donations had come from New Zealand’s Indian community.
A fundraising dinner was organised by the New Zealand Nepal Society at the Freemans Bay Community Centre in Auckland last week.
Supplied
Last week, the Nepali community raised $100,000 through a fundraising dinner at the Freemans Bay Community Centre in Auckland.
The Central Sikh Association donated $50,000 to Nepal that same night.
Earlier this month, Gurdwara Shri Dashmesh Darbaar Sahib in Papatoetoe pledged $15,000, which was matched by the New Zealand Indian Central Association.
Shiv Mandir in Manurewa donated $4000, while Manurewa Local Board member Marshal Ahluwalia and National Party Manurewa candidate Ghouse Majeed donated $7500.
Khadka said the Federation of Islamic Associations of New Zealand had pledged $5000, which would be directly deposited into Nepal’s Prime Minister’s Disaster Relief Fund.
Other fundraising events included a dosa event in Māngere organised by Thiru Subramaniyar Aalayam on 5 September, and a fundraising dinner organised by the Nepal-New Zealand Friendship Society of Canterbury in Rolleston on 12 September.
A similar dinner was organised by the Waikato Indian Association and Nepal-New Zealand Waikato Friendship Society in Hamilton on 9 September, while the Taranaki Nepalese Community is planning a fundraising dinner in New Plymouth on 26 September.
He said the fundraising was a temporary effort to support people who had lost everything in the floods.
“Nepal will take decades to rebuild and whatever we raise now will go to the people who are in most need right now,” he said.
Khadka said more fundraising events were being planned across New Zealand.
Next week, Wellington Mutamizh Sangam’s youth wing will hold a youth festival to raise funds for Nepal, while the Indian Film Festival in October has also pledged to support fundraising efforts for the country, with a Nepali film included in its programme.
Khadka said the response had shown him how much New Zealanders cared about Nepal.
“Wherever we go, I see New Zealanders approaching me and asking how they can support Nepal,” he said.
“That makes me proud of New Zealand and how lucky we are to be called New Zealanders.”
Khadka also warned that some organisations were using the disaster to make money.
“It is very sad to see that there are organisations who are raising money but it doesn’t reach the Prime Minister’s Disaster Relief Fund, so my request to people who are donating their hard-earned money is to make sure that you donate through the right channels,” he said.
Dinesh Khadka is leading fundraising efforts for Nepal flood victims in New Zealand.
Supplied
Khadka said he was receiving regular updates from Nepal Police, who were doing their best to recover bodies and search for survivors.
“More than 1400 bodies [have] already [been] found but they’re looking through the rubble and buildings to find more than 5000 bodies or even survivors,” he said.
Khadka said he did not have an update on the missing New Zealanders.
Five New Zealanders remain missing following the deadly flash floods: Dejan Kuzmic, Shweta Mhatre, Mihir Patel, Kinnari Patel and Suhasini Reddy.
More than 300 foreign nationals have been rescued, according to an update from Nepal’s National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority.
No New Zealanders have been included in that number.
RNZ understands Mhatre and Kuzmic were part of the Isha Foundation’s pilgrimage, and Sadhguru had previously said two New Zealanders were missing from his trekking group.
Meanwhile, Reddy’s family has called on rescuers not to stop searching for the 44-year-old after conflicting reports about her status emerged online.
Reddy’s brother Rajeev and his wife Lauren urged people to keep searching for survivors in a Facebook post several weeks ago.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said New Zealand’s consular response team in Kathmandu was engaged with local authorities and the Nepalese Government.
“However, challenges on the ground mean that new, verified information will continue to take time to emerge.”
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said New Zealand had extended an offer of technical expertise to aid Nepal’s response effort in addition to humanitarian assistance worth $3.5 million to support the humanitarian response.
The Warriors will need to take the hard path to the NRL Grand Final, having lost to the Dolphins in their qualifier at Go Media Mount Smart Stadium.
A victory in week one would have seen the Warriors take a week off and advance straight to the preliminiary finals in week three.
Instead they’ll take on the Newscastle Knights in a must-win elimination final on Sunday.
Here’s who plays who next:
Week two: Semi-finals
The teams that lost their qualifying finals get another chance. They play the winners of the elimination finals in two sudden death games.
The two winners would then move on to the preliminary finals.
Cronulla Sharks v Sydney Roosters, Saturday, 9.50pm at Allianz Stadium, Sydney
Warriors v Newcastle Knights, Sunday 6.05pm at Eden Park, Auckland
Warriors boss Cameron George is expecting Sunday’s game to sell out, in what he describes as an international for his side.
“It’s us versus Australia. So the more people we get there, the better New Zealand will be.
“There are 17 teams in this comp and we’re the only one from here so it’s us against them. This is our New Zealand grand final in the NRL and it’s pretty special.”
Warriors club members can buy tickets from midday Monday with general public tickets going on sale Tuesday.
If the Warriors win against the Knights this weekend, they’ll go on to play the Panthers.
Andrew Cornaga/www.photosport.nz
Week three: Preliminary final
The four remaining teams play in the preliminary finals.
The Panthers and Dolphins have advanced straight to the prelims where they’ll meet the winners of the semi finals.
If the Warriors win against the Knights this weekend, they’ll go on to play the Panthers.
The winner of the Sharks v Roosters match this weekend will face the Dolphins.