The increasing number of people counting every last dollar in their weekly family budget might have been hoping the coalition had some reprieve in store.
But the Finance Minister has been immovable in her belief that the best medicine for New Zealanders is getting the country back into surplus.
It’s a somewhat pointy-headed sweetener for voters in election year – an ‘eat your veges if you want dessert’ Budget that means having what’s good for you but not what you really want, and sometime in the future the good bit will arrive.
It’s a strategy that works for people who earn enough to cover the bills already, have savings, or can make ends meet if push comes to shove, but if you’re already living life on the breadline it’s a bitter pill to swallow.
For those people, it’s a strange Budget in what are for an increasing number of people the toughest of times.
There were significant spends in areas like defence (a sizeable $2.3 billion of capital and $1.2b in operating funding), the big headline was the books being back in the black a year earlier, and nearly half a billion dollars was put aside for fuel crisis-related spending – but ultimately the government decided not to allocate it.
In other words it’s a Budget that for low-income working households might not resonate, is focused on things they’re not thinking about day-to-day, and where there was money to be spent on a bit of extra cash in their backpockets or relief at the pump or on public transport, instead Willis said just hold fire.
Minister of Finance Nicola Willis delivered her 2026 “Securing New Zealand’s Future” national Budget yesterday. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
The rainy day fund may be spent before the election if the Iran conflict endures, or things get so bad politically the government – or specifically National – decide they need to spray the little ring-fenced bit of money they have to remind voters they haven’t forgotten them.
Willis has clearly weighed all this up and decided to back her fiscally responsible beliefs that this year, an election year, is the time to keep it simple and focus on the bigger picture down the track.
Her messaging was succinct and well-rehearsed in the Budget lock-up, the House, and her post-Budget interviews – that it was her “responsibility to be careful and prudent now to protect New Zealand’s future”.
Outside of the surplus forecast being due to arrive a year earlier, the big sell to New Zealanders was investment in core frontline services.
Health was the big winner on that front with a $5.8b boost, along with $682 million of capital investment.
Infrastructure also got its fair share, with the people of Waikato getting $1.8b for the Cambridge to Piarere expressway, and rail getting a decent lift to upgrade the network.
In an election year it may not be a Budget that will help National turn around the polls, but it creates problems for Labour too.
The security blanket of ‘let’s see what the Budget says’ is gone now for the Opposition, and the spotlight will shortly turn on Labour leader Chris Hipkins to reveal what his alternative government would do differently.
There are hard decisions to be made in a geopolitical climate as fraught and volatile as it is right now, and the pressure will now go on Labour to paint a picture of what it would do differently.
Criticising the government is easy; offering a fully-costed and feasible alternative won’t be.
rnz