Connect with us

HTML Image

i

NZ News

Rimutaka Prison corruption: Corrections officer sentenced for smuggling drugs and alcohol to inmate

Published

on

A Corrections officer smuggled drugs and alcohol into Rimutaka Prison for an inmate in exchange for sexual favours from a female associate of the man.

But prisoner Wayne Te Awawa John Clarke wasn’t impressed with the quality and quantity of the drugs and his associate, whose name is suppressed, questioned why she was providing sexual favours to the prison guard, given Clarke’s lack of gratitude.

Yesterday, the guard, whose name is also suppressed, was sentenced in the Wellington District Court on one representative charge of bribery and corruption of a public official.

The disposition of that case has allowed the offending by Clarke and his associate, who were sentenced in February, to be reported.

The prisoner and the prison guard

According to the summary of facts, the prison guard and Clarke’s female associate met in April 2020, when she handed him the class B controlled drug GBL and, later the same month, two bottles of L&P laced with alcohol.

Despite being in the first national Covid lockdown, the guard delivered both to Clarke’s cell in the prison’s high/medium-security risk unit.

After receiving the drugs, Clarke complained about the quality of the GBL and accused the woman of not delivering the full amount.

The woman, unhappy with Clarke’s accusations and verbal abuse, suggested the guard should get the contraband from elsewhere. But she agreed to continue having sex with him.

Despite the conflict, the trio continued to communicate and the woman met the guard again that month and handed over two bottles of L&P.

The guard delivered the bottles to Clarke’s cell while working a night shift, when he was alone on the unit.

Several days later, the bottles were found by another Corrections officer, with one smelling of alcohol.

When spoken to, the guard denied being involved in corruption at the prison, claiming he was delivering a laundry bag to Clarke.

But he couldn’t explain his close associations with the woman or his communications with Clarke.

Meanwhile, the woman admitted to having sex with the guard on several occasions, saying she would see him up to twice a week.

At the guard’s sentencing, the key issue for Judge Peter Hobbs was whether to impose a sentence of home or community detention.

The man’s lawyer, Elizabeth Hall, sought a sentence of community detention, saying it would allow her client to find work.

“If he could do home detention and work, then I wouldn’t be standing here,” she said.

Hall said her client was living off his savings. When those were exhausted, he would be without work and unable to meet his financial obligations, including paying a mortgage and household expenses. This, in turn, would harm his partner and wider family, she said.

She submitted that a corruption conviction would have a lasting impact and the length of time since the offending, as well as the loss of career and the impact that had on him, warranted a sentence of community detention.

But Crown prosecutor Katherine Werry said the man had effectively spent two years on full pay since being stood down from his job, only resigning in February this year when he pleaded guilty.

She said there was nothing that prevented him from working or training while on home detention.

Werry also took issue with Hall’s claim the man was a pawn of Clarke, saying he’d initiated contact with Clarke’s associate to facilitate the collection of contraband.

The court heard another prison guard, arrested as part of the same operation, was sentenced to community detention.

But Judge Hobbs said in that case the defendant was working and any sentence short of community detention would have jeopardised that employment.

“I am not satisfied you are in the same position,” he told the guard at Tuesday’s sentencing, referring to a pre-sentence report that said Corrections could assist the man with finding a job or receive further training.

He ordered the man to serve nine months’ home detention.

Judge Hobbs declined to grant the prison guard and Clarke’s associate permanent name suppression but allowed them interim suppression pending an appeal.

Clarke was sentenced in February after he admitted two charges of unauthorised delivery and was jailed for one month, to be served concurrently on the sentence he was already serving. The charges related to the delivery of drugs and alcohol to his cell in Rimutaka Prison in April 2020.

Judge Nicola Wills noted the aggravating factors included that the offending occurred on two occasions and involved a Corrections officer.

At the same time, his associate was convicted and discharged after admitting two charges of unauthorised delivery, relating to her supply of the drugs and alcohol to Clarke in April 2020.

Judge Wills found a sentence of community work wasn’t appropriate for the woman.

“It is clear to me that you have a degree of vulnerability in terms of your mental health and the challenges you face in your personal life”.

Operation Portia

The trio were the last of six to be sentenced as part of an investigation, dubbed Operation Portia, by the National Organised Crime Group into suspected criminal activity at Rimutaka Prison that concluded in December 2023.

Almost 200 people were interviewed as part of the operation, including Corrections staff, prisoners and other witnesses. The investigation involved interrogation of phones, bank data and combing through hours of CCTV footage.

Most faced charges of corruption and bribery, which required the Attorney-General’s consent to prosecute.

The six, who were aged between 37 and 50, included inmate Clarke, his associate, a current Corrections employee and former employees.

The court adopted a starting point of two years, eight months’ jail for those facing bribery and corruption charges.

The other sentences

Corrections officer Neil Falelima Potter was sentenced in August 2024 to nine months’ home detention after admitting three charges of corruption of an enforcement officer.

On three occasions in October and December 2020, the then prison officer took tobacco and food provided by an inmate’s partner, who paid him $3700, into Rimutaka Prison.

Judge Michael Mika said at Potter’s sentencing that it was a serious breach of trust.

“You were employed as a Corrections officer. It is a position of trust and authority. The offending of corruption by Corrections officers is a very serious breach of trust that undermines our penal system.”

In November 2024, another Corrections officer, whose name is suppressed, received eight months’ home detention after admitting a representative charge of corruptly accepting a bribe.

The man agreed to smuggle tobacco to prisoners in 2019 if they deposited money into an associate’s account.

According to the summary of facts, $4500 was transferred into the bank account, with the officer receiving $4220.

Judge Stephen Harrop noted the obvious breach of trust and authority.

“You were a Corrections department officer dealing with a prisoner, so you have betrayed the trust of your employer, your colleagues at the prison and the wider public, which places trust in people holding your position to act honestly and with integrity,” the judge told the man.

The following year, in November 2025, Jason Mokalei, also a Corrections officer, was sentenced to six months’ community detention on a representative charge of corruptly accepting a bribe.

He was found to have brought contraband into prison on a number of occasions during 2020.

Judge David Laurenson, KC, told him at sentencing that “your offending involved a serious breach of trust and risks undermining the integrity of the penal system”.

“It involves significant pre-mediation and planning, and it was carried out for the purposes of receiving, and you received some, financial gain,” the judge said.

Source: New Zealand Herald & RNZ

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Police say person who fired gun at officers still at large

Published

on

Police say a person who fired a gun at officers in Napier is still at large.

Eastern District Commander Superintendent Joel Lamb said Police tried to stop a vehicle in the Pirimai Area at about 10pm on Tuesday.

He said someone in the back seat pointed what was presumed to be a firearm at officers pursuing the vehicle.

“Staff have then heard two distinct gunshots as the firearm was discharged.

“Fortunately, neither of our officers were injured, and the patrol vehicle did not sustain any damage.”

He said hours later, the vehicle was seen travelling north on the Waikato Expressway towards Auckland.

Police seized the vehicle at an address in Manurewa, but they had not found the alleged offender.

Lamb said people who lived at the Manurewa address were engaging with Police.

He said Eastern District and Counties Manukau Police were making enquiries.

“Presenting a firearm at a Police officer is a serious escalation that puts our staff and the wider community at risk. This behaviour is entirely unacceptable.

“We are taking this incident extremely seriously and will be pursuing all lines of enquiry to locate the offender and hold them accountable.”

Police asked anyone who witnessed the incident to contact Police on 105 or online using the reference number 261111/3764.

Information could also be provided anonymously via Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111.

rnz

Continue Reading

Latest News

New Zealand sides named for RLWC finals

Published

on

The players tasked with ending Australia’s Rugby League World Cup dominance have been named.

The Kiwis and Kiwi Ferns have announced their squads for this Sunday’s World Cup finals in Brisbane.

Both sides are chasing their first titles since 2008, and both are looking to end their opponents run of three crowns in a row.

“Our Kiwi Ferns have been so dominant in years gone by, and we want to bring dominance back to this jersey, so I think it will be a case of who wants it more,” said co-captain Georgia Hale of the impending clash.

The Kiwis get a major boost for the final as they welcome back Ronaldo Mulitalo after he served a one-match ban for a high tackle against Fiji Bati.

Mulitalo replaces Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad, who moves to the six-man bench, which again includes utility Te Maire Martin, middle forwards Naufahu Whyte, Erin Clark and Xavier Willison plus fullback Keano Kini.

Loose forward Joseph Tapine will make his 30th Test appearance in a familiar pack again, including second-rowers Isaiah Papali’i and Briton Nikora, and props James Fisher-Harris and Moses Leota.

Winger Jamayne Isaako is on the cusp of claiming the New Zealand record for most Test points.

His five goals against Tonga lifted his career points tally to 225 – level with Shaun Johnson – while centre Casey McLean goes into the final with 16 tries in just eight Tests.

Fisher-Harris will again captain the team.

Fullback Ponga said the goal of the group was clear.

“We have high expectations around what we want to achieve, and obviously winning a world Cup is one of them.”

Meanwhile, Ricky Henry has selected a settled side to take on the Jillaroos, led by their lethal centre combination of Stacey Waaka and Mele Hufanga.

Veteran Apii Nicholls takes the number one jersey, Leianne Tufuga and Mackenzie Wiki on the wings.

Henry has stuck with his halves pairing of Chantay Kiria-Ratu and Raecene McGregor with Alexis Tauaneai, Georgia Hale and Otesa Pule up front.

Rounding out the starting pack is Shaniece Monschau, Kaiyah Atai, and Angelina Teakaraanga-Katoa.

“We have been building well throughout the tournament; we understand the Jillaroos side, and will give it our all to make New Zealand proud this weekend,” said Henry.

RLWC Finals:

Kiwi Ferns vs Jillaroos- 6.10pm

Kiwis vs Kangaroos – 9.35pm

Sunday November 15

Suncorp Stadium, Brisbane

Live blog updates on RNZ

Kiwi Ferns:

1. Apii Nicholls 2. Leianne Tufuga 3. Mele Hufanga 4. Stacey Waaka 5. Mackenzie Wiki 6. Chantay Kiria-Ratu 7. Raecene McGregor 8. Alexis Tauaneai 9. Georgia Hale 10. Otesa Pule 11. Shaniece Monschau 12. Kaiyah Atai 13. Angelina Teakaraanga-Katoa.

Interchange: 14. Ashleigh Quinlan 15. Annessa Biddle 16. Shannon Mato 17. Ivana Lauitiiti.

Reserves: 18. Brooke Anderson 19. Zahara Temara 20. Brianna Clark 21. Abigail Roache 22. Tenika Willison.

Kiwis:

1. Kalyn Ponga, 2. Jamayne Isaako, 3. Dane Gagai, 4. Casey McLean, 5. Ronaldo Mulitalo, 6. Kodi Nikorima, 7. Jahrome Hughes, 8. James Fisher-Harris (c), 9. Jeremy Marshall-King, 10. Moses Leota, 11. Isaiah Papali’i, 12. Briton Nikora, 13. Joseph Tapine (v/c).

Interchange: 14. Te Maire Martin, 15. Naufahu Whyte, 16. Erin Clark, 17. Xavier Willison.

Reserves: 18. Keano Kini, 19. Phoenix Crossland, 20. Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad, 21. Scott Sorensen, 22. Leo Thompson.

rnz

Continue Reading

Latest News

Opportunities to mitigate multi-million-dollar RNZ budget blowout likely missed – experts

Published

on

Multiple opportunities to identify and mitigate a multi-million-dollar budget blowout at RNZ appear have been missed, according to the former executive director at Audit New Zealand.

The public broadcaster on Monday revealed a near $12 million shock financial loss after a litany of financial blunders, which will now lead to sweeping job cuts.

The $11.8m loss is more than 25 times the $470,000 RNZ had expected to lose over the year to June.

CEO Paul Thompson took responsibility for the result, and said internal reports gave an inaccurate picture of the finances, meaning the scale of the loss only became clear in October.

RNZ’s former chief financial officer Hilary Parker resigned unexpectedly in early October.

The board said it would commission an independent review into what went wrong.

Independent contractor Stephen Walker, who left the Audit Office earlier this year, said the size of the loss was surprising, as was the length of time it took to identify it – months after the financial year ended.

Stephen Walker.
Independent contractor Stephen Walker is a former executive director at Audit New Zealand.

Supplied / OAG

“Probably more of a concern is that they had seemingly been unaware that they were running up a significant deficit until they were in the preparation stage of their annual report in October.”

Walker said public entities typically produced monthly financial reports.

An interim audit also took place before the end of the financial year, he said, but if the organisation hadn’t identified significant losses at that stage, the auditor could also be in the dark.

“It seems that there’s a real weakness in forecasting and budgeting that’s occurred here and that the monthly accounts, when they’re produced, either haven’t identified these significant variances against budget or the magnitude of them really hasn’t come to light until right towards the end of the financial year,” Walker said.

“And really at that point, there’s no opportunity for the chief executive, the leadership team to take, and the board to take, any corrective action because the year has effectively been completed.”

Walker said the “significant miss” was difficult to account for given it was more than 10 percent of RNZ’s total funding.

He said based on RNZ’s annual report, financial complexity didn’t appear to be a factor.

“This $11.8m loss isn’t made up of one particular item … it seems to have been contributed to by a number of separate expense lines running over budget. So I don’t think it’s necessarily to do with complexity.”

Among the errors, RNZ wrongly counted $2m from land sales as income in its budget. Staff costs also came in $3.2m over budget, including $1.4m in redundancy payments.

Professor at Auckland University’s business school Norman Wong said based on media reports the issues identified were “significant and troubling”.

Norman Wong.
Norman Wong.

Supplied / University of Auckland

“But recognising the sale of land as income in their budget is a basic error that one would have expected to have been caught and corrected well before it got to this point.”

With funding reductions at RNZ over the past two years, Walker expected greater scrutiny of financial results.

“Virtually every public entity has had their annual budget reduced. And so you would expect … the leadership team on a monthly basis and board – I’m not sure how frequently the board will consider the information – but you would expect them to be interrogating the results on a regular basis throughout the year,” he said.

Walker said initiating an independent review was the correct course of action and that he’d want to understand what information the leadership team and the board were regularly receiving.

He said he’d “love to say” surprising financial results were rare, but conceded they occured on a semi-frequent basis during his time leading the Audit Office.

“The benefit of independent scrutiny by the Audit Office – and the auditors providing that support to the Auditor General – [is] that the reporting is fairly presented at the end of the year, whether it’s good, bad or ugly.”

rnz

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 The Buzz: Powered by Apna Network Limited - Concept by Digital Hub NZ