Connect with us

HTML Image

i

Breaking News

Jack Hargreaves admits the murder of his brother, armed seizure of car after Hamilton shooting

Published

on

Jack Hargreaves’ brother and flatmate were trying to get into his bedroom when he fired three shotgun rounds through the door they were standing in front of.

A short time later, after the terrified flatmate had fled the Hamilton home, Hargreaves spotted his older brother Joshua lying injured on the ground outside.

The 20-year-old rolled his brother over, heard him groan, and then walked off. He didn’t even call 111.

On Tuesday Hargreaves appeared in the High Court at Hamilton, where he pleaded guilty to Joshua’s murder, along with charges of discharging a firearm with reckless disregard at his flatmate, unlawfully carrying a firearm, armed robbery of a Suzuki Swift, and failing to stop for police on Great South Road.

Justice Kiri Tahana convicted Hargreaves on all charges and remanded him in custody for sentencing on 31 March.

‘He’s stealing my marijuana’

The lengthy summary of facts details what happened on the night of 9 July last year.

Joshua Hargreaves had lived at the Belmont Avenue property in Chartwell for a number of years before his friend moved in January last year.

Jack Hargreaves moved into the house the following month.

However, within a few months, the relationship between the brothers began to deteriorate, more so when Jack suffered an injury, which meant he was unable to work.

He was instead regularly at home as his brother and flatmate went to work.

Jack regularly began going into his brother’s bedroom and stealing his marijuana despite the plant being kept in a locked safe.

While living at the house, the flatmate unlawfully stored three firearms in the wardrobe of his bedroom: a 13-inch pump-action shotgun, a Dill black powder shotgun and a Ruger 10-22 rifle with a silencer and scope.

The two shotguns were kept in a hard case that had four locks on it, and the keys were kept on a green lanyard together with his car keys.

The Ruger was also secured with a padlock in a case and kept on the same lanyard that was often left in his bedroom.

The flatmate had shown the brothers the firearms on a number of occasions.

‘You’re not coming in here’

Before the shooting, the flatmate and the victim had become concerned about Jack’s behaviour.

Court documents state he had been “acting strangely” and there was some tension in the house.

After a discussion with Joshua, the flatmate moved his firearms from his bedroom.

On 9 July, at 6.30pm, the flatmate took both gun cases from his bedroom but noticed the grey case felt light, and opened it to find it empty.

Both shotguns were missing.

The flatmate immediately told Joshua, and the pair confronted Jack in the doorway of his bedroom about where the firearms were.

The confrontation became heated.

An argument broke out, and the flatmate suggested to Jack that the pair go outside, saying “Come on then, one outs?”

Jack ultimately told the flatmate to “give him an hour to try and look for” the firearms, to which he initially agreed.

However, after five or 10 minutes, the flatmate asked him why he needed an hour and told him he wanted to search his bedroom.

Jack shut his bedroom door and barricaded it with a small TV cabinet, telling the flatmate, “You’re not coming in here”.

Joshua began trying to push open the defendant’s door, but was unable to.

As Joshua stood trying to open the door, Jack fired the Dickinson 13-inch pump-action shotgun three times, one after another.

Joshua was shot in the upper chest as the flatmate ran from the house.

The flatmate could hear Joshua groaning in agony. He didn’t want to leave him, but was too scared to go back.

He was certain Jack would shoot him, given he’d just shot his own brother.

Instead, he ran to a neighbour’s property, but still didn’t feel safe so he ran out on to the street and down Belmont Avenue on foot.

‘Hey bro’

As he was running in a local park, he rang 111.

As he spoke to the operator, he noticed Jack walking towards him.

Jack said, “hey bro” in a taunting manner from about 100m away.

Unbeknown to the flatmate, Jack was carrying the shotgun.

The flatmate ran down an alleyway on to the footpath of Bankwood Road and screamed for help.

A short time later, an emergency call was made by an associate of Jack, and he was told that Jack had just killed his brother.

A second associate then also called 111 and told them Jack had shot his brother through the door and was running from police.

Jack wanted to kill himself and was going to get rid of his phone.

Police arrived at the house about 7pm. The front door was open, and the shotgun was on Jack’s bed.

Joshua was found dead out the back of the house.

‘Get out of the car or die’

By 12.20am, Jack was hitch-hiking on Gordonton Road.

A motorist spotted Jack with his thumb out, and because it was raining, he decided to turn around and offer him a ride.

Pulling over, he asked him if he was “all good?” and Jack replied that he was going to Rototuna.

He then approached the driver and pointed the shotgun at his face.

With it approximately 30cm from the victim’s face, Jack said, “Get out of the car or die”.

“I will let you live, I just want the car.”

The two occupants got out of the car and walked away, as Jack told them to call police and tell them their car had been stolen.

They called police, and soon afterwards, the Suzuki Swift was spotted by officers on Great South Road heading toward Ngāruawāhia.

Police activated their flashing lights, but Jack sped off.

Road spikes were eventually laid, and he was arrested.

Jack was co-operative and assisted police with their questions and admitted to taking the two shotguns.

He said he was confronted about the guns and lied to the victims, saying he didn’t have them, before going into his room and barricading himself in.

He admitted firing three shots through the door when his brother and flatmate were trying to open it.

He said he didn’t specifically know who was on the other side of the door when he fired the shots.

After moving through the house with the shotgun, he spotted his brother lying on the ground.

He rolled him over and heard him groan in response.

He left him there and didn’t call 111.

* This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald.

~ RNZ

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Breaking News

Trump administration denounces CNN for airing Iranian leaders’ messages

Published

on

The Trump administration denounced CNN on Thursday (local time) for airing a portion of the new Iranian supreme leader’s public statement, the second time in three days the network has been targeted for reporting on how the regime is responding to the American attacks.

The attack illustrated the care news outlets must take in reporting during wartime, and the responsibilities of American journalists to report the perspective of countries its government views as enemies. It also exposed inconsistencies.

The message of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei during his first public statement since he succeeded his father, who was killed in an Israeli airstrike, was widely available elsewhere.

The White House said on social media that “fake news CNN just aired four straight minutes of uninterrupted Iranian state TV, run by the same psychotic and murderous regime that prided itself on brutally slaughtering Americans for 47 years”.

Earlier CNN interview criticised by Trump’s communications leader

Two days earlier, White House communications director Steven Cheung took issue with CNN anchor Erin Burnett’s interview with Hossein Mousavian, a former Iranian nuclear negotiator. Burnett asked Mousavian what he had been hearing about the Iranian government’s interest in having talks with the United States. There wasn’t much, he said.

“Ever notice how CNN just regurgitates quotes and unverified information from Iranian terrorists?” Cheung wrote on X.

“Total disgrace. They have become the murderous Iranian Regime’s version of Pravda,” he said, referring to the official newspaper of the former Soviet Union.

CNN did not address Cheung’s statement but did respond to the White House attack on Thursday. It noted that CNN, Sky News and Al Jazeera also showed portions of the ayatollah’s statement live.

“The world is watching with anticipation which direction this war will take,” CNN said. “Purported remarks from Iran’s new supreme leader are a critical component in helping audiences understand where this conflict is heading and were aired for their obvious news value.”

Other news outlets, including The Associated Press, sent out alerts on what Khamenei said. His vow to keep up attacks on other Arab countries in the region and plans to choke off the world’s oil supply were headlines.

Mojtaba Khamenei, the son of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, center, attends the annual Quds, or Jerusalem Day, rally in Tehran, Iran, May 31, 2019.

The New York Times led its website with a story on the speech in its immediate aftermath, later writing that the speech “was an early indication of how the new supreme leader would approach the war, as well as how he would lead the country”.

CNN has long been a favoured target of President Donald Trump, dating back to his first term. It’s a particularly vulnerable time for the network with Paramount Global’s agreement to purchase CNN’s parent company, Warner Bros Discovery, raising questions about its future editorial independence.

CNN showed a news anchor reading a portion of Khameini’s remarks in Farsi, with an English translation. It did not air them in full. After the speech, correspondent Nick Paton Walsh gave a debrief to anchor Kate Bolduan, noting how the non-appearance of the leader — reportedly injured in an air attack — was as important as what he said.

“We were waiting to see the face of the man to have proof of his health and survival,” Walsh said, “and they’ve not met that moment. Instead, a handwritten message, it seems, that mostly reiterates things we kind of already knew.”

A social media message board for Iran’s point of view

The Tech Transparency Project has reported that several Iranian leaders and institutions maintain verified accounts on X, formerly Twitter, owned by Trump ally Elon Musk. CNBC said Thursday that Khamenei has one of them, and an X account with his portrait posted the text of his remarks, available in Farsi and in an English translation.

Even though Khamenei’s father is dead, an account with his portrait was active on Thursday, mainly reposting messages from his son. “The revenge we have in mind is not just because of the martyrdom of the illustrious Leader of the Revolution,” read one message posted Thursday. “Every member of the nation martyred by the enemy is a separate case that demands we seek revenge.”

X is officially blocked in Iran, although many use a virtual private network to bypass restrictions. A message sent to the platform on Thursday was not immediately returned.

There’s a long history of journalists seeking interviews with world leaders, even when they are regarded as enemies of the United States. Most notable was 60 Minutes correspondent Mike Wallace’s interview with Iran’s Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979, when that country was holding Americans hostage.

Thursday’s remarks by Iran’s new supreme leader were absolutely newsworthy and legitimate for CNN to air them, said Jane Ferguson, a veteran international correspondent and founder of the journalism platform Noosphere. It’s not the job of government leaders to pick apart what CNN is reporting, she said.

“We’ve always faced this,” she said, about when reporters interview leaders or other figures hostile to American interests. “This has been a bit of low-hanging fruit for a while.”

Historian Douglas Brinkley of Rice University said that it’s unfair for CNN to be singled out in this instance. He, too, believes it is newsworthy to learn what leaders of an adversary are thinking, but it’s important to make sure that journalists are careful.

“You have to be leery of being used as a propaganda tool by the Iranian regime,” he said. “On the other hand, knowing what the enemy is saying and looking for a sign of a peace offering or a nuance is important … It’s a difficult balance.”

Continue Reading

Breaking News

University of Auckland building on fire

Published

on

A fire at the University of Auckland law school building has now been extinguished.

A Fire and Emergency spokesperson said there had been a fire at the University and six fire trucks were at the scene on Short Street. The call to 111 came through at about 2.40pm.

FENZ said the fire was now extinguished but crews will stay near the building this afternoon.

Staff and students were seen going in floor by floor, starting with level 6, to retrieve any belongings left behind

A student who was evacuated from the fourth floor of the building said it seemed the fire started on level two.

Police were at the scene talking to students who have been evacuated.

Student Talisha Lal said when the fire alarm went off she, and other students, thought it was a drill.

Lal said once she was out of the building, she could see smoke.

More to come…

~ RNZ 

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Teacher struck off after filming explicit videos at school

Published

on

An Auckland teacher has had her registration cancelled after recording explicit videos of herself urinating on the floor of a classroom and on a student’s belongings.

The New Zealand Teachers Disciplinary Tribunal found Lisa Marie Edmondson had committed serious misconduct.

The school was alerted to the content after the deputy principal of the school was approached by a member of the public who had come across a video on TikTok and recognised the setting. A search for the username led to a pornographic account.

The account contained more than 30 explicit videos which had been recorded at various locations over a period of two-and-a-half years.

In one of the videos, Edmondson appeared to urinate on the floor of a classroom with genitalia clearly visible. A second video showed the teacher urinating on a hat with a student’s name clearly visible in a lost property box.

The summary of facts stated there was an “ongoing urine smell” in some classrooms during the time of her employment which had been attributed to rats and mice. Bait stations had been set up during the school holidays but no rodent activity was noted. The tribunal said her students were “likely to have been adversely affected” due to evidence of an “unpleasant smell that required deep cleaning”.

While she was not visible in the videos, the teacher was recognised due to her voice and clothing.

Edmondson resigned in May 2023 after receiving notice of a formal investigation.

Following her resignation, Edmondson worked as a relief teacher at a second school before being invited to apply for a fixed-term position.

The tribunal found that Edmondson had failed to disclose her full employment history when applying for – and subsequently working at – a new school in 2023 and failing to inform her employer that she was the subject of a mandatory report and current investigation by the Teaching Council.

In her reflective statement, Edmondson acknowledged that she had let her students down and “was not the role model that I should have been for them”.

“I have accepted that the likelihood of returning as a teacher has ended. This has been a very difficult concept to accept because I loved teaching, loved being in the classroom and loved my students and their whānau.”

The tribunal noted Edmondson failed to address the conduct head on or express concern for her former students and colleagues.

Edmondson’s registration was cancelled and the former teacher was issued a formal censure. She was ordered to pay $3,255.87 towards the Complaints Assessment Committee’s costs and $582 to the Teaching Council.

‘I have let down so many people’

In a statement to Stuff, Edmondson said she had no choice but to accept the ruling, but regretted her actions.

“During a two-year period which covers this time I was suffering from extreme anxiety, I can’t explain why I did it other than self sabotage and treating myself badly for things that had happened. By the time it was reported, I really did not even remember and hadn’t done anything else.”

Her actions had impacted her children and her ability to provide for them.

“I can’t change what I have done, but can make sure it never happens again.”

~ RNZ

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 The Buzz: Powered by Apna Network Limited - Concept by Digital Hub NZ