Connect with us

HTML Image

i

World

The unanswered questions looming over the Prince Andrew scandal

Published

on

Britain’s royal family has stripped Prince Andrew of his royal titles and ordered him out of his 30-room residence in the grounds of Windsor Castle, bowing to intensifying pressure over his association with disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

There has been an avalanche of headlines coinciding with the publication of a posthumous memoir, Nobody’s Girl, by Andrew’s accuser Virginia Giuffre. The royal family will have hoped Andrew’s decision to give up the use of his royal titles and honours would put an end to the saga. But it was not enough.

Once celebrated as a decorated war hero, Andrew, the brother of King Charles III, has been thrown into the royal wilderness, not even invited to spend Christmas with his family at their Sandringham estate, and now unceremoniously stripped of his titles and booted out of his home.

Andrew insists he never met Giuffre, who accused him of sexually assaulting her while she was a teenager, and has always denied accusations of wrongdoing against him. Critics say the royal family and UK government did not act swiftly enough to hold the disgraced royal to account. Giuffre died by suicide in April at the age of 41.

How close were Andrew and Epstein?

The former prince, now plain Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, was one of the many high-profile individuals to associate with Epstein. Andrew has said the pair were introduced by Epstein’s then girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell in 1999. He later said they met “infrequently,” adding that their encounters were “probably no more than only once or twice a year.”

He also admitted to staying at several properties belonging to the disgraced financier, who was found dead in his New York prison cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges.

Andrew is known to have attended a charity fundraiser at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida in 2000, at which Maxwell was also present, according to photographs published in the Palm Beach Post at the time.’

Months later, Epstein and Maxwell mingled with royalty at a Windsor Castle party hosted by Queen Elizabeth II to mark Andrew’s 40th birthday, as well as Princess Anne’s 50th, the Queen Mother’s 100th and Princess Margaret’s 70th. Andrew later invited the couple back to Windsor in 2006 for his daughter Princess Beatrice’s extravagant 18th birthday ball, according to Britain’s The Sun on Sunday newspaper.

In 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty to two state prostitution charges and registered as a sex offender in a deal that allowed him to avoid federal charges.

When did Andrew cut ties with Epstein?

The long-running friendship has raised persistent questions about Andrew’s judgement, given his position at the time as a working royal, a status he gave up in 2019.

In her book, Giuffre details the three occasions she allegedly had sex with the prince – in London, New York and on Epstein’s Caribbean island, Little St. James. She claimed that Andrew correctly guessed she was underage in the United States when they were introduced and that Epstein gave her $15,000 (NZ$26,000) “for servicing the man the tabloids called ‘Randy Andy.'”

She also repeated a claim from a 2015 sworn declaration that the third encounter was “an orgy” on Epstein’s island with the financier and “approximately eight other girls” who “appeared to be under the age of 18 and didn’t really speak English.”

Andrew reached an out-of-court settlement with Giuffre in 2022 after she filed a civil suit against him in New York. While he didn’t admit wrongdoing, Andrew did acknowledge Giuffre’s suffering as a victim of sex trafficking.

The royal has always denied all accusations against him and insisted that he never witnessed or suspected any of the behaviour of which Epstein was accused. In a now-infamous BBC interview in 2019, Andrew said that he had severed all ties with Epstein in 2010.

However, a newly reported email from 2011 has called that claim into question. Earlier this month, The Mail on Sunday and The Sun on Sunday newspapers reported that Andrew appeared to reach out to Epstein once more, telling him to “keep in close touch” and that they were “in this together.” Andrew has not responded to the reports and CNN has reached out for comment.

Meanwhile, London’s Metropolitan Police has said it is “actively looking into” a Mail on Sunday report that Andrew in 2011 asked a police officer assigned to him as a bodyguard to dig up dirt on Giuffre.

What did the royal family know and when?

It remains unclear what the royal family, or other members of the royal household, knew about the extent of Andrew’s relationship with Epstein, and when they knew it.

The 2019 BBC interview was filmed at Buckingham Palace, but the depth of the household’s knowledge of his friendship with Epstein is uncertain.

Both his staff and his security detail would have been aware of his movements at the time he associated with Epstein. But the royal family has not commented publicly on any of that.

Why was Andrew not stripped of his titles sooner?

Andrew’s behaviour put King Charles in a difficult position: effectively banish his brother as a royal outcast or allow the steady drumbeat of negative headlines to risk further reputational damage to the institution.

Andrew had already stepped back from his frontline duties in 2019 and was stripped of his military titles and charity patronages by the late Queen in 2022. But the palace clearly felt something more had to be done to halt the seemingly weekly drip-feed of salacious headlines.

On 17 October, Andrew announced that he would stop using his Duke of York title as well as relinquishing other titles and honours bestowed upon him by the royal family over the years. (He was also known as the Earl of Inverness and Baron Killyleagh, a Knight Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order and as a Royal Knight Companion of the Most Noble Order of the Garter.)

Andrew said the decision was made in consultation with King Charles, as well as other members of the family, because the “continued accusations” were distracting from the family’s work. “I have decided, as I always have, to put my duty to my family and country first,” he added.

And there’s the rub – keeping it in the family means he did not give up the titles; he merely gave up use of them, and so technically he still held all of them.

But critics, including Giuffre’s brother, said there needed to be greater accountability.

In the end, Charles decided to take the extraordinary step on Thursday of moving to formally take away Andrew’s titles and honours.

The monarch is understood to be sending royal warrants to the Lord Chancellor to secure the removal of the Dukedom of York from the Peerage Roll, as well as the title of Prince and Style of “Royal Highness.” His other subsidiary titles of Inverness and Killyleagh are similarly affected.

Andrew was made a duke, the highest rank in Britain’s system of hereditary peerage, when he married ex-wife Sarah Ferguson in 1986. Removing the title requires an act of Parliament, which would be a protracted process.

While Andrew was known officially as the Duke of York, it’s not a title that many outside the UK would be familiar with and ultimately the status of prince is the only one that matters.

Andrew became a prince automatically at birth, as the son of the then reigning monarch, and that status can only be changed if King Charles issues a directive known as a Letters Patent.

Despite Thursday’s announcement, Andrew remains eighth in line to the British throne. That status could be removed by legislation, but this would require the consent of Commonwealth nations around the world, which would take time. The last time this protocol was used was when Edward VIII abdicated in 1936.

Why did he continue living on royal property?

Despite the deepening scandal, Andrew continued to live with his ex-wife at Royal Lodge, a 30-room mansion on the Windsor estate, outside London, despite reported attempts by Charles to persuade him to relocate. He secured a 75-year lease on the property in 2003.

Profits from the estate are paid to the British government and further outrage was ignited after it was revealed that the terms of the rental agreement effectively mean Andrew has never paid rent on the accommodation.

The lease required an initial one-off payment of £1 million (NZ$2.29 million). Additionally, he was required to pay a further £7.5 million to cover refurbishments which were completed in 2005, according to a National Audit Office report.

After those upfront costs, the lease states he has since paid an annual rent of “one peppercorn (if demanded),” a copy of the Royal Lodge leasehold agreement showed.

The agreement also includes a clause that the Crown Estate would have to pay Andrew £558,000 if he gave up the property early.

“The National Audit Office reviewed the lease arrangements for Royal Lodge in 2005 and in its report, which was published at that time, concluded that the Crown Estate does not have any special procedures when negotiating agreements with the Royal Family,” a Downing Street spokesperson said earlier in October. “An independent evaluation concluded that the transaction with Prince Andrew and Royal Lodge was appropriate.”

Regardless, there had been mounting pressure on Andrew to leave the property, which sits in Windsor Great Park close to a chapel used by the royals.

Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, wrote to the Crown Estate and Treasury to seek further information on Royal Lodge. “This forms part of our long-standing remit, on behalf of Parliament and the British public, to examine the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of public spending, and ensure the taxpayer is receiving best value for money,” he said in a statement.

A YouGov poll published in October revealed that four in five Britons would support Andrew being formally stripped of his dukedom.

The Palace may have felt that it had no option but to order Andrew to leave the residence, given the increased scrutiny from lawmakers and the brewing scandal.

Are there other scandals involving Andrew?

Andrew has also faced furious questions over his business deals with China and his contact with an alleged Chinese spy. Court documents revealed the disgraced royal’s apparently close relationship with Yang Tengbo.

In a tribunal hearing in December 2024 that upheld an earlier decision to bar Yang from the UK, it was revealed that Yang was authorised to act on Andrew’s behalf during business meetings with potential Chinese investors in the UK, and that he was invited to Andrew’s 60th birthday party in 2020. Throughout a government investigation into the relationship, Yang has denied any wrongdoing.

Andrew’s office said at the time that he ceased his relationship with Yang after receiving government advice.

Meanwhile, fresh documents released this year revealed that Andrew sent birthday wishes each year to Chinese leader Xi Jinping. A witness statement from a former aide to the royal revealed that Andrew had a “communication channel” with China through Yang but insisted that there was “nothing to hide.”

Source: CNN & RNZ

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

Voters deliver historic rebuke to Trump as Democrats win House and Senate

Published

on

By Joseph Ax, Brad Heath and Jason Lange

Democrats seized control of both the Senate and House on Tuesday (US time), scoring sweeping victories in Republican strongholds for the first time in generations as tens of millions of voters delivered a scathing rebuke to President Donald Trump.

Voters in conservative bastions who had propelled the president to his second term in office just two years ago swung dramatically toward Democrats, fueled by deep frustration over the unpopular war with Iran, anxiety over the high cost of living and anger at Trump’s stewardship of the country.

Kansas elected its first Democratic senator since the Great Depression nearly a century ago. In South Carolina, a state that Trump carried by nearly 18 points in 2024, Democrats turned aside his hand-picked Senate candidate.

And in Texas, the biggest Republican state, Democrats ended a decades-long losing streak in seismic fashion, winning a Senate seat and ousting three-term Governor Greg Abbott.

The results will usher in a new era of divided government in Washington, following two years in which the Republican-controlled Congress rarely exercised its power to rein in Trump.

Once seated in January, Democrats are expected to use their power to investigate Trump’s administration, family and allies and demand concessions on major legislation. The Democratic Senate can block Trump’s nominees, including any US Supreme Court justices should a vacancy arise.

“There is now a generational remake of the Senate map that is going to change America,” said Chuck Schumer, the party’s Senate minority leader. “Americans voted for change, and now Democrats must deliver.”

Trump, who is barred by the US Constitution from seeking a third term, has exercised an iron grip on his party for most of the last decade. But the new balance of power in Washington may accelerate his lame-duck status, as attention turns toward the 2028 presidential race and potential successors begin competing for political influence in a post-Trump world.

Despite worries from Democrats that Trump might seek to overturn the election results, as he did in 2020, the president accepted the outcome, congratulating Democrats in an interview with Fox News. He also said he would work with Democrats on issues such as immigration, though he threatened to veto any “insane” bills they passed.

rnz

Continue Reading

World

Cold case solved: DNA links serial killer Ted Bundy to 1974 murder of Utah teen

Published

on

A Utah cold case tied to notorious serial killer Ted Bundy has been solved.

Fifty-two years to the day her body was found, detectives closed the investigation into the murder of 17-year-old Melissa Ann Smith. DNA evidence identified Bundy as the killer, investigators revealed Tuesday.

Smith’s body was found by hunters in a wooded area bordering Salt Lake and Summit counties on 27 October, 1974. The investigation into her murder has remained open since that day, until now.

A recent break in a Utah County cold case is being attributed to the resolution. Investigators say the same DNA profile used to identify Bundy as the killer of Laura Ann Aime was used to solve Smith’s murder.

Developments in that case brought the Smith investigation back to the surface and helped resolve the decades-old mystery, Summit County Sheriff Kacey Bates said.

Tuesday’s announcement was hinted at by Utah County investigators in April, when they announced the closure of the Aime cold case, which was tied to Bundy. At the time, a UCSO detective said the DNA profile used to link Bundy to the murder had been shared with other departments, with the hope that it could lead to closing more cases.

Bundy, who is confirmed to have killed and assaulted women across Washington, Oregon, Colorado, Utah and Florida between 1974 and 1978, confessed to 28 murders but is believed to be responsible for hundreds of deaths.

He was executed by electric chair in Florida in 1989.

Source: RNZ & CNN

Continue Reading

World

Netanyahu touts Trump endorsement on eve of vote, suggests they may restart war on Iran

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu boasted of his endorsement from Donald Trump on the eve of Israel’s election, suggesting the two leaders could restart their war against Iran if he wins, after Trump said they should “finish the job”.

“US President Donald Trump has come with a friendship that has never existed before between an Israeli prime minister and an American president. And it is doubtful we will ever have such a friendly president again,” Netanyahu said in a televised appearance late on Sunday night. “He has another two years, and he says he is calling on you to vote for me.”

In his own social media post on Sunday, Trump, who launched the Iran war jointly with Netanyahu in February, said: “Vote for Bibi Netanyahu for Prime Minister, we have to finish the job that we started!”

Netanyahu said Trump was willing to take action “that would finally, finally, remove the Iranian threat”, but only as long as Netanyahu himself remains in power.

“And I have already instructed the Mossad and the IDF (military) to bring down this regime, to bring down this regime because that is the only way to put an end to this threat,” Netanyahu said, referring to Israel’s main intelligence service and military.

Asked for comment on Netanyahu’s remarks, White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly said: “As President Trump stated, Iran is in very bad condition, both economically and militarily, and the blockade will remain in full force and effect, with oil flowing in record numbers of barrels through the Hormuz Strait.”

“The United States will not be attacking Iran at any time prior to the midterm elections,” Kelly added via email, referring to the November 3 vote in the US.

Netanyahu’s leading opponent, centrist former military Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot, posted his own comments on social media, praising Trump as “a true friend of Israel”.

“I value his efforts and his commitment to Israel’s security, and I am confident that he will work in full cooperation with any leader chosen by the people.”

Former Israeli Defence Minister Benny Gantz (2nd-R) and former Israeli army chief of staff Gadi Eisenkot (R), both members of the current Israeli five-person war cabinet led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, meet with the visiting US Secretary of State in Tel Aviv on February 8, 2024. (Photo by Mark Schiefelbein / POOL / AFP)
Former Israeli Defence Minister Benny Gantz (2nd-R) and former Israeli army chief of staff Gadi Eisenkot (R).

Mark Schiefelbein / POOL / AFP

Eisenkot accuses Netanyahu of fear-mongering

Tuesday’s vote, Israel’s first since the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks, is the first chance for voters to deliver a verdict on the worst security failure in generations and the wars on multiple fronts that followed.

With Netanyahu already at the helm of the most right-wing government in Israeli history, politics have shifted even further to the right. Nearly all Jewish-led parties, including that of the hawkish Eisenkot, now oppose the “two-state solution” that underpinned decades of peace negotiations with the Palestinians.

But many voters say the divisive politics of Israel’s longest-serving leader make the country weaker. Polls suggest Netanyahu’s Likud Party will lose seats, potentially depriving his coalition of right-wing, far-right and ultra-Orthodox parties of its narrow majority.

Eisenkot and an array of opposition parties ranging from the rump of the centre-left to the right, also have no clear path to unseat him.

Netanyahu, 77, is an unrivaled master of political survival: the only time since 2009 that opponents managed to wrest him briefly from the premiership, it took four inconclusive elections within two years to get him out. He was back 18 months later.

Neither side planned major public events for Monday. But both posted on social media, drumming on the election’s major themes: for Netanyahu, that he is the only leader with the mettle to face down Israel’s enemies; for his opponents, that his divisive politics have weakened the country.

Netanyahu shared an AI-generated video on Monday of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, whose father Ali Khamenei was killed on the first night of US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February. Lying in a hospital bed, the younger Khamenei says his own vote would be “definitely not Bibi. Another term like this and I will be meeting my father sooner than expected.”

On Sunday Netanyahu posted a computer-generated photo of a mushroom cloud over Tel Aviv, saying Israel was in existential danger from Iran.

Eisenkot responded by accusing him of “relying on a campaign of fear-mongering, lies, and threats – including images of nuclear bombs in the heart of Tel Aviv. This time, it won’t work for him.”

Trump’s endorsement of Netanyahu carries its own political risks a week before a legislative election in which his own Republicans are seeking to hold onto power.

The Iran war is deeply unpopular in the United States, blamed for a surge in prices especially for fuel. Major fighting has been suspended for months after ceasefire negotiations held without Israeli participation.

Source: Reuters & RNZ

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 The Buzz: Powered by Apna Network Limited - Concept by Digital Hub NZ