A scammer claiming they had been wrongly served onions has been noticed in Wellington. File photo. Photo: 123rf
At least two scams are doing the rounds in Wellington
Restaurant Association says some Christchurch eateries have also been targeted
Fraudsters are targeting cafes, restaurants and bars, with at least two scams doing the rounds of the capital’s dining scene, as well as some in Christchurch.
Hospitality NZ spokesperson Sam McKinnon says one scam doing the rounds in the capital involves a man claiming to be a diner, whose partner had become severely ill after eating there.
In several cases it was alleged the woman had gone into anaphylactic shock after eating onions which she was allergic to.
Another cafe was asked for a refund by a man who said his companion had had food poisoning.
The businesses realised it was the same person, after the scam was flagged up on a hospitality sector Facebook page, McKinnon said.
It was “disappointing and frustrating” for the sector, particularly in the tough economic climate, he added.
Fortune Favours venue manager Rachael Lee said she believed her bar was targeted by the same man earlier this month.
“He was claiming he’d ordered food and his wife, who was allergic to onions, had been given onions, and due to the fact that they weren’t New Zealand citizens they had been over-charged hospital bills and now it was on us to pay them.
“We never want to have someone be over-charged, so we always try to check receipts and look through past transactions. But there was never any proof, just demanding money without providing any evidence.”
Her suspicions were confirmed when she heard other venues had been targeted by similar scams. She was aware of about 10 bars targeted by the onions scam and thought at least several of them fell for it, which could have been potentially costly, she added.
“Some people have smelt a rat and said no, go away. But others have been called out and handed over the money.”
None of the stories matched, she said. “If I hadn’t seen the [Facebook group] post that he had already hit other bars, we probably would have been scammed out of a lot of money.”
Maura Rigby – the co-owner and director of Beach Babylon and Little Beer Quarter – said both venues had been targeted by people running “the overcharging or double charging scam” at least twice in the past six months.
Staff had been alerted to two attempts to get refunds based on fabricated credit card statements, she said. “We’re talking about $200 to $300, not huge numbers, when you compare it to large scams like bank fraud. But for the hospitality industry, it’s a nuisance and it’s a significant amount of money.”
When the person making the claim was asked for extra evidence, “we found that the person just disappeared”. The same thing had happened this year, although she was not sure if it was a different person, or group of people, she said.
“We’re a customer service industry, we want to please our customers and put any problems, anything not done right, as quickly as possible.
“Initially we’re always really receptive to hear if there was a mistake and we thoroughly investigate it. But now we’ll just be asking for a little bit more information so that we can ensure that it actually matches up with transactions that happened at our businesses, rather than just people targeting us because we like to please our customers.
“It’s not a great time for us. I guess other people are doing it tough too, and that might be why there’s a rise of scams like this. But we don’t have the margins to withstand extra expenses like this at the moment.”
Restaurant Association chief executive Marisa Bidois said it had been alerted to the scams by members in both Wellington and Christchurch. The association was sending out a notice to alert others who may not have heard about it, she added.
Scams put additional stress on restaurants in challenging economic times. “Having to deal with this and figuring out what’s genuine and what’s not can be a bit of a minefield.”
It was important for companies dealing with these sorts of complaints to request a receipt, establish the details correctly, and have a clear refund and complaints policy, she said.
“It is surprising how often people will claim to have been in a restaurant and eaten a certain dish, and then later on the owner will discover they definitely weren’t here, as they didn’t serve that dish that night. In some cases, we’ve seen people stating that they’ve consumed something that isn’t even on the menu. It definitely pays to gather all the information.”
The Trump administration denounced CNN on Thursday (local time) for airing a portion of the new Iranian supreme leader’s public statement, the second time in three days the network has been targeted for reporting on how the regime is responding to the American attacks.
The attack illustrated the care news outlets must take in reporting during wartime, and the responsibilities of American journalists to report the perspective of countries its government views as enemies. It also exposed inconsistencies.
The message of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei during his first public statement since he succeeded his father, who was killed in an Israeli airstrike, was widely available elsewhere.
The White House said on social media that “fake news CNN just aired four straight minutes of uninterrupted Iranian state TV, run by the same psychotic and murderous regime that prided itself on brutally slaughtering Americans for 47 years”.
Earlier CNN interview criticised by Trump’s communications leader
Two days earlier, White House communications director Steven Cheung took issue with CNN anchor Erin Burnett’s interview with Hossein Mousavian, a former Iranian nuclear negotiator. Burnett asked Mousavian what he had been hearing about the Iranian government’s interest in having talks with the United States. There wasn’t much, he said.
“Ever notice how CNN just regurgitates quotes and unverified information from Iranian terrorists?” Cheung wrote on X.
“Total disgrace. They have become the murderous Iranian Regime’s version of Pravda,” he said, referring to the official newspaper of the former Soviet Union.
CNN did not address Cheung’s statement but did respond to the White House attack on Thursday. It noted that CNN, Sky News and Al Jazeera also showed portions of the ayatollah’s statement live.
“The world is watching with anticipation which direction this war will take,” CNN said. “Purported remarks from Iran’s new supreme leader are a critical component in helping audiences understand where this conflict is heading and were aired for their obvious news value.”
Other news outlets, including The Associated Press, sent out alerts on what Khamenei said. His vow to keep up attacks on other Arab countries in the region and plans to choke off the world’s oil supply were headlines.
Mojtaba Khamenei, the son of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, center, attends the annual Quds, or Jerusalem Day, rally in Tehran, Iran, May 31, 2019. (Source: Associated Press)
The New York Times led its website with a story on the speech in its immediate aftermath, later writing that the speech “was an early indication of how the new supreme leader would approach the war, as well as how he would lead the country”.
CNN has long been a favoured target of President Donald Trump, dating back to his first term. It’s a particularly vulnerable time for the network with Paramount Global’s agreement to purchase CNN’s parent company, Warner Bros Discovery, raising questions about its future editorial independence.
CNN showed a news anchor reading a portion of Khameini’s remarks in Farsi, with an English translation. It did not air them in full. After the speech, correspondent Nick Paton Walsh gave a debrief to anchor Kate Bolduan, noting how the non-appearance of the leader — reportedly injured in an air attack — was as important as what he said.
“We were waiting to see the face of the man to have proof of his health and survival,” Walsh said, “and they’ve not met that moment. Instead, a handwritten message, it seems, that mostly reiterates things we kind of already knew.”
A social media message board for Iran’s point of view
The Tech Transparency Project has reported that several Iranian leaders and institutions maintain verified accounts on X, formerly Twitter, owned by Trump ally Elon Musk. CNBC said Thursday that Khamenei has one of them, and an X account with his portrait posted the text of his remarks, available in Farsi and in an English translation.
Even though Khamenei’s father is dead, an account with his portrait was active on Thursday, mainly reposting messages from his son. “The revenge we have in mind is not just because of the martyrdom of the illustrious Leader of the Revolution,” read one message posted Thursday. “Every member of the nation martyred by the enemy is a separate case that demands we seek revenge.”
X is officially blocked in Iran, although many use a virtual private network to bypass restrictions. A message sent to the platform on Thursday was not immediately returned.
There’s a long history of journalists seeking interviews with world leaders, even when they are regarded as enemies of the United States. Most notable was 60 Minutes correspondent Mike Wallace’s interview with Iran’s Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979, when that country was holding Americans hostage.
Thursday’s remarks by Iran’s new supreme leader were absolutely newsworthy and legitimate for CNN to air them, said Jane Ferguson, a veteran international correspondent and founder of the journalism platform Noosphere. It’s not the job of government leaders to pick apart what CNN is reporting, she said.
“We’ve always faced this,” she said, about when reporters interview leaders or other figures hostile to American interests. “This has been a bit of low-hanging fruit for a while.”
Historian Douglas Brinkley of Rice University said that it’s unfair for CNN to be singled out in this instance. He, too, believes it is newsworthy to learn what leaders of an adversary are thinking, but it’s important to make sure that journalists are careful.
“You have to be leery of being used as a propaganda tool by the Iranian regime,” he said. “On the other hand, knowing what the enemy is saying and looking for a sign of a peace offering or a nuance is important … It’s a difficult balance.”
A fire at the University of Auckland law school building has now been extinguished.
A Fire and Emergency spokesperson said there had been a fire at the University and six fire trucks were at the scene on Short Street. The call to 111 came through at about 2.40pm.
FENZ said the fire was now extinguished but crews will stay near the building this afternoon.
Staff and students were seen going in floor by floor, starting with level 6, to retrieve any belongings left behind
A student who was evacuated from the fourth floor of the building said it seemed the fire started on level two.
Police were at the scene talking to students who have been evacuated.
Student Talisha Lal said when the fire alarm went off she, and other students, thought it was a drill.
Lal said once she was out of the building, she could see smoke.
An Auckland teacher has had her registration cancelled after recording explicit videos of herself urinating on the floor of a classroom and on a student’s belongings.
The New Zealand Teachers Disciplinary Tribunal found Lisa Marie Edmondson had committed serious misconduct.
The school was alerted to the content after the deputy principal of the school was approached by a member of the public who had come across a video on TikTok and recognised the setting. A search for the username led to a pornographic account.
The account contained more than 30 explicit videos which had been recorded at various locations over a period of two-and-a-half years.
In one of the videos, Edmondson appeared to urinate on the floor of a classroom with genitalia clearly visible. A second video showed the teacher urinating on a hat with a student’s name clearly visible in a lost property box.
The summary of facts stated there was an “ongoing urine smell” in some classrooms during the time of her employment which had been attributed to rats and mice. Bait stations had been set up during the school holidays but no rodent activity was noted. The tribunal said her students were “likely to have been adversely affected” due to evidence of an “unpleasant smell that required deep cleaning”.
While she was not visible in the videos, the teacher was recognised due to her voice and clothing.
Edmondson resigned in May 2023 after receiving notice of a formal investigation.
Following her resignation, Edmondson worked as a relief teacher at a second school before being invited to apply for a fixed-term position.
The tribunal found that Edmondson had failed to disclose her full employment history when applying for – and subsequently working at – a new school in 2023 and failing to inform her employer that she was the subject of a mandatory report and current investigation by the Teaching Council.
In her reflective statement, Edmondson acknowledged that she had let her students down and “was not the role model that I should have been for them”.
“I have accepted that the likelihood of returning as a teacher has ended. This has been a very difficult concept to accept because I loved teaching, loved being in the classroom and loved my students and their whānau.”
The tribunal noted Edmondson failed to address the conduct head on or express concern for her former students and colleagues.
Edmondson’s registration was cancelled and the former teacher was issued a formal censure. She was ordered to pay $3,255.87 towards the Complaints Assessment Committee’s costs and $582 to the Teaching Council.
‘I have let down so many people’
In a statement to Stuff, Edmondson said she had no choice but to accept the ruling, but regretted her actions.
“During a two-year period which covers this time I was suffering from extreme anxiety, I can’t explain why I did it other than self sabotage and treating myself badly for things that had happened. By the time it was reported, I really did not even remember and hadn’t done anything else.”
Her actions had impacted her children and her ability to provide for them.
“I can’t change what I have done, but can make sure it never happens again.”