Connect with us

HTML Image

i

Breaking News

Clashes in Parliament over MPs’ behaviour continue

Published

on

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Labour leader Chris Hipkins have clashed in Parliament over Luxon’s management of his ministers.

Luxon fired back at Hipkins about MP Duncan Webb’s video featuring protesters chanting about the prime minister killing children.

He also appeared to insult Australians, saying it pays to be simple when communicating with them after being challenged over the removal of te reo Māori greetings from a Matariki invitation for an Australian politician.

Kicking off Question Time on Wednesday, Hipkins raised Trade Minister Todd McClay’s comment to Green MP Ricardo Menéndez March that “you’re not in Mexico now”, and his apology letter which said that was “friendly banter”, and asked if Luxon considered that was the standard of behaviour he expected.

Luxon said it had been good to see McClay apologise, but Hipkins continued to push – asking whether calling it banter was the type of workplace culture the prime minister was trying to create.

Luxon said that was “a bit rich” considering Hipkins’ former minister and senior MP Duncan Webb had uploaded a video “saying that I’m killing children, I don’t think that’s appropriate”.

Hipkins said Luxon was not responsible for Webb, pointing out he had not really addressed the question.

Leader of the Opposition, Chris Hipkins, during the Budget Debate 2024.

Labour leader Chris Hipkins in Parliament (file photo) Photo: VNP / Phil Smith

Luxon tried again, saying he was asking all political leaders to watch their rhetoric.

But Hipkins continued, asking whether Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters “providing a running commentary on the gender of international athletes” met Luxon’s standards of behaviour.

Peters then demanded Hipkins apologise, saying his social media post “says nothing of the sort”, but Speaker of the House Gerry Brownlee made a ruling that supplementary questions were part of a free-flowing discussion and did not need checking. Luxon said he had nothing more to add.

Hipkins said Luxon had still not addressed his question. Luxon said Peters had denied what Hipkins was alleging, and was “doing an exceptionally good job … lifting the intensity and the urgency of our relationships across the Indo Pacific like no one’s done before”.

Hipkins continued, asking about Minister of Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith’s removal of te reo Māori greetings from Matariki celebration invites for an Australian minister.

“Well, I would just say to that member, we value te reo on this government,” Luxon said. “What I’d say to you, in my dealings with Australians, it always pays to be incredibly simple and clear and use English,” Luxon said.

“Good to see him leading by example,” Hipkins remarked, before embarking on his next question, about Children’s Minister Karen Chhour choosing to continue wearing an ACT lapel pin, which according to the ruling set down by Brownlee had prevented her from answering questions.

Luxon said Chhour was “doing a fantastic job” before saying Hipkins’ line of questioning was petty.

Karen Chhour

Children’s Minister Karen Chhour speaks to reporters at Parliament Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone

“This is a country where our economy is in real trouble. This is a country where we cannot deliver health and education services as well as we need to, and we have rising levels of crime, and this is the line of questioning from the leader of the Opposition.”

Brownlee stepped in as the government MPs clapped and cheered, warning another outburst would see someone removed.

Hipkins defended his questioning, saying Chhour’s action had been the first time in his 16 years in Parliament a minister had refused to answer a Parliamentary question.

“That is the job of ministers, and I think the Prime Minister should be expected to address that question rather than do the very thing that he’s been telling everyone else all week not to do and attack the questioner,” Hipkins said.

ACT leader David Seymour argued Chhour had tried to answer the question but was not allowed to, but Hipkins said Chhour could simply have removed her badge to enable her to answer.

“She chose to refuse to answer the question. That is a matter of ministerial conduct, and it is absolutely appropriate that the Prime Minister be questioned on that and asked to explain it,” Hipkins said.

Brownlee backed Hipkins on that, but said it was his own responsibility as Speaker, not Luxon’s as prime minister. Hipkins said it was a matter of ministerial conduct for which Luxon was answerable, but Brownlee said the matter had been settled.

“And I expect that the current compliance with the rules of the house will continue without losing a question,” Brownlee said.

However, Hipkins pushed back.

“Ministers come under significant pressure, and the minister was under significant pressure last week, and we respected the ruling that you made as the Speaker. That does not ever excuse ministers of the Crown from being held to the same standard as every other minister of the Crown … why a minister in [Luxon’s] government prioritised promoting her political party over discharging her duties as a minister.”

Parliament's Speaker, Gerry Brownlee, is handed the vote tally by the clerk on duty at the Table.

Speaker of the House Gerry Brownlee Photo: VNP / Phil Smith

Brownlee allowed Hipkins to ask the question again, and Luxon said Brownlee had “addressed that question, I think, very well. There was challenges last week. He has reset the tone of this House, and we deal with that going forward”.

Seymour again interjected with a patsy question, asking Luxon what the people of New Zealand needed from the government.

“What they want is a government that’s going to rebuild the economy, restore law and order and deliver better health and education. Those are the big issues that outside of this place,” Luxon said.

But Hipkins only used this to keep pressing Luxon.

“If that is indeed the priorities of this government, why are his ministers refusing to answer questions in the House, prioritising wearing party badges instead; making racial taunts to members on the opposite side of the House; refusing to use te reo Māori in their correspondence promoting things like Matariki; providing a commentary on the gender of international athletes; and, of course, attacking the courts, which is something we haven’t got to yet.”

Luxon brushed this off.

“What I observe, is I see a hard-working Cabinet and a set of ministers that are actually doing the business for New Zealand,” he said, pointing to efforts to curb inflation, lower crime, and support education.

“I look at our Education Minister [Erica Stanford] who did more in six hours and six days than that member [Hipkins] did as education minister for six years. A look at what our health minister is doing to make sure that we improve our health outcomes for Māori, non-Māori and all New Zealanders. That’s what I see.”

During the entire exchange, Brownlee had repeatedly interrupted and demanded that questions be heard in silence, in keeping with his promise to take a more vigilant approach to policing behaviour in the House.

Ahead of Question Time, he had also refused Labour MP Willie Jackson’s request for Parliament to urgently debate the removal of te reo Māori greetings from Matariki invites.

Brownlee suggested it was not important enough to delay Parliament’s work.

“This is a particular case of recent occurrence for which there is ministerial responsibility, the big hurdle however for applications for urgent debate is whether the issue raised warrants setting aside the business of the House,” Brownlee said.

VIA RNZ

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Breaking News

Trump administration denounces CNN for airing Iranian leaders’ messages

Published

on

The Trump administration denounced CNN on Thursday (local time) for airing a portion of the new Iranian supreme leader’s public statement, the second time in three days the network has been targeted for reporting on how the regime is responding to the American attacks.

The attack illustrated the care news outlets must take in reporting during wartime, and the responsibilities of American journalists to report the perspective of countries its government views as enemies. It also exposed inconsistencies.

The message of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei during his first public statement since he succeeded his father, who was killed in an Israeli airstrike, was widely available elsewhere.

The White House said on social media that “fake news CNN just aired four straight minutes of uninterrupted Iranian state TV, run by the same psychotic and murderous regime that prided itself on brutally slaughtering Americans for 47 years”.

Earlier CNN interview criticised by Trump’s communications leader

Two days earlier, White House communications director Steven Cheung took issue with CNN anchor Erin Burnett’s interview with Hossein Mousavian, a former Iranian nuclear negotiator. Burnett asked Mousavian what he had been hearing about the Iranian government’s interest in having talks with the United States. There wasn’t much, he said.

“Ever notice how CNN just regurgitates quotes and unverified information from Iranian terrorists?” Cheung wrote on X.

“Total disgrace. They have become the murderous Iranian Regime’s version of Pravda,” he said, referring to the official newspaper of the former Soviet Union.

CNN did not address Cheung’s statement but did respond to the White House attack on Thursday. It noted that CNN, Sky News and Al Jazeera also showed portions of the ayatollah’s statement live.

“The world is watching with anticipation which direction this war will take,” CNN said. “Purported remarks from Iran’s new supreme leader are a critical component in helping audiences understand where this conflict is heading and were aired for their obvious news value.”

Other news outlets, including The Associated Press, sent out alerts on what Khamenei said. His vow to keep up attacks on other Arab countries in the region and plans to choke off the world’s oil supply were headlines.

Mojtaba Khamenei, the son of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, center, attends the annual Quds, or Jerusalem Day, rally in Tehran, Iran, May 31, 2019.

The New York Times led its website with a story on the speech in its immediate aftermath, later writing that the speech “was an early indication of how the new supreme leader would approach the war, as well as how he would lead the country”.

CNN has long been a favoured target of President Donald Trump, dating back to his first term. It’s a particularly vulnerable time for the network with Paramount Global’s agreement to purchase CNN’s parent company, Warner Bros Discovery, raising questions about its future editorial independence.

CNN showed a news anchor reading a portion of Khameini’s remarks in Farsi, with an English translation. It did not air them in full. After the speech, correspondent Nick Paton Walsh gave a debrief to anchor Kate Bolduan, noting how the non-appearance of the leader — reportedly injured in an air attack — was as important as what he said.

“We were waiting to see the face of the man to have proof of his health and survival,” Walsh said, “and they’ve not met that moment. Instead, a handwritten message, it seems, that mostly reiterates things we kind of already knew.”

A social media message board for Iran’s point of view

The Tech Transparency Project has reported that several Iranian leaders and institutions maintain verified accounts on X, formerly Twitter, owned by Trump ally Elon Musk. CNBC said Thursday that Khamenei has one of them, and an X account with his portrait posted the text of his remarks, available in Farsi and in an English translation.

Even though Khamenei’s father is dead, an account with his portrait was active on Thursday, mainly reposting messages from his son. “The revenge we have in mind is not just because of the martyrdom of the illustrious Leader of the Revolution,” read one message posted Thursday. “Every member of the nation martyred by the enemy is a separate case that demands we seek revenge.”

X is officially blocked in Iran, although many use a virtual private network to bypass restrictions. A message sent to the platform on Thursday was not immediately returned.

There’s a long history of journalists seeking interviews with world leaders, even when they are regarded as enemies of the United States. Most notable was 60 Minutes correspondent Mike Wallace’s interview with Iran’s Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979, when that country was holding Americans hostage.

Thursday’s remarks by Iran’s new supreme leader were absolutely newsworthy and legitimate for CNN to air them, said Jane Ferguson, a veteran international correspondent and founder of the journalism platform Noosphere. It’s not the job of government leaders to pick apart what CNN is reporting, she said.

“We’ve always faced this,” she said, about when reporters interview leaders or other figures hostile to American interests. “This has been a bit of low-hanging fruit for a while.”

Historian Douglas Brinkley of Rice University said that it’s unfair for CNN to be singled out in this instance. He, too, believes it is newsworthy to learn what leaders of an adversary are thinking, but it’s important to make sure that journalists are careful.

“You have to be leery of being used as a propaganda tool by the Iranian regime,” he said. “On the other hand, knowing what the enemy is saying and looking for a sign of a peace offering or a nuance is important … It’s a difficult balance.”

Continue Reading

Breaking News

University of Auckland building on fire

Published

on

A fire at the University of Auckland law school building has now been extinguished.

A Fire and Emergency spokesperson said there had been a fire at the University and six fire trucks were at the scene on Short Street. The call to 111 came through at about 2.40pm.

FENZ said the fire was now extinguished but crews will stay near the building this afternoon.

Staff and students were seen going in floor by floor, starting with level 6, to retrieve any belongings left behind

A student who was evacuated from the fourth floor of the building said it seemed the fire started on level two.

Police were at the scene talking to students who have been evacuated.

Student Talisha Lal said when the fire alarm went off she, and other students, thought it was a drill.

Lal said once she was out of the building, she could see smoke.

More to come…

~ RNZ 

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Teacher struck off after filming explicit videos at school

Published

on

An Auckland teacher has had her registration cancelled after recording explicit videos of herself urinating on the floor of a classroom and on a student’s belongings.

The New Zealand Teachers Disciplinary Tribunal found Lisa Marie Edmondson had committed serious misconduct.

The school was alerted to the content after the deputy principal of the school was approached by a member of the public who had come across a video on TikTok and recognised the setting. A search for the username led to a pornographic account.

The account contained more than 30 explicit videos which had been recorded at various locations over a period of two-and-a-half years.

In one of the videos, Edmondson appeared to urinate on the floor of a classroom with genitalia clearly visible. A second video showed the teacher urinating on a hat with a student’s name clearly visible in a lost property box.

The summary of facts stated there was an “ongoing urine smell” in some classrooms during the time of her employment which had been attributed to rats and mice. Bait stations had been set up during the school holidays but no rodent activity was noted. The tribunal said her students were “likely to have been adversely affected” due to evidence of an “unpleasant smell that required deep cleaning”.

While she was not visible in the videos, the teacher was recognised due to her voice and clothing.

Edmondson resigned in May 2023 after receiving notice of a formal investigation.

Following her resignation, Edmondson worked as a relief teacher at a second school before being invited to apply for a fixed-term position.

The tribunal found that Edmondson had failed to disclose her full employment history when applying for – and subsequently working at – a new school in 2023 and failing to inform her employer that she was the subject of a mandatory report and current investigation by the Teaching Council.

In her reflective statement, Edmondson acknowledged that she had let her students down and “was not the role model that I should have been for them”.

“I have accepted that the likelihood of returning as a teacher has ended. This has been a very difficult concept to accept because I loved teaching, loved being in the classroom and loved my students and their whānau.”

The tribunal noted Edmondson failed to address the conduct head on or express concern for her former students and colleagues.

Edmondson’s registration was cancelled and the former teacher was issued a formal censure. She was ordered to pay $3,255.87 towards the Complaints Assessment Committee’s costs and $582 to the Teaching Council.

‘I have let down so many people’

In a statement to Stuff, Edmondson said she had no choice but to accept the ruling, but regretted her actions.

“During a two-year period which covers this time I was suffering from extreme anxiety, I can’t explain why I did it other than self sabotage and treating myself badly for things that had happened. By the time it was reported, I really did not even remember and hadn’t done anything else.”

Her actions had impacted her children and her ability to provide for them.

“I can’t change what I have done, but can make sure it never happens again.”

~ RNZ

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 The Buzz: Powered by Apna Network Limited - Concept by Digital Hub NZ