{"id":4393,"date":"2023-05-11T14:42:45","date_gmt":"2023-05-11T02:42:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thebuzz.apnanetwork.co.nz\/?p=4393"},"modified":"2023-05-11T14:42:45","modified_gmt":"2023-05-11T02:42:45","slug":"legal-decision-puts-police-on-notice-about-photographing-people-association-says","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thebuzz.apnanetwork.co.nz\/?p=4393","title":{"rendered":"Legal decision &#8216;puts police on notice&#8217; about photographing people, association says"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A Court of Appeal decision potentially limiting how police can photograph people in public could set a precedent the Police Association says would dramatically change how officers investigate crime.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.rnz.co.nz\/news\/national\/489640\/court-of-appeal-finds-officer-illegally-photographed-man-during-random-traffic-stop\">The court found<\/a>\u00a0an officer illegally photographed a man during a random traffic stop, amounting to a breach of the Bill of Rights.<\/p>\n<p>The picture was cross referenced with CCTV footage to identify the man and used as evidence in a trial where he was convicted of robbery.<\/p>\n<p>The court found there was no lawful reason to take the man&#8217;s picture as he was standing on the side of the road, as officers were not gathering evidence about his offending.<\/p>\n<p>He was compelled by circumstances to leave the vehicle and his photograph was taken simply on the basis that it might be useful in the future.<\/p>\n<p>It said the man had a reasonable expectation of privacy.<\/p>\n<p>Police Association president Chris Cahill said he was &#8220;very&#8221; disappointed by the decision.<\/p>\n<p>It appeared to bar officers from taking pictures of people in public to gather intelligence, and only allow it if they were investigating a particular offence, he said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It will dramatically change how officers are able to approach gathering evidence and certainly gathering intelligence.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And the only people who are going to win out of this are criminals, it&#8217;s not going to protect the public.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It would lead to fewer crimes being solved, and the actions by officers that night were in line with public expectations, Cahill said.<\/p>\n<p>The decision could have such &#8220;severe implications&#8221; that Cahill would like the solicitor-general to step in and consider whether the Crown should mount an appeal.<\/p>\n<h3>Decision puts police &#8216;on notice&#8217;<\/h3>\n<p>University of Otago law professor Andrew Geddis said the crucial part of the decision was the finding that people do have a reasonable expectation to privacy in a public place.<\/p>\n<p>While the decision did not mean police could never photograph people, the court had now put limitations around it, he said.<\/p>\n<p>Photos taken unlawfully and then submitted by police as evidence in court could be thrown out.<\/p>\n<p>The Court of Appeal found that despite the picture being taken unlawfully it was still acceptable to use it as evidence in the robbery trial.<\/p>\n<p>The court said officers acted in good faith and it was important evidence which led to a conviction.<\/p>\n<p>But it also said a different conclusion could be reached if police continued to unlawfully photograph people.<\/p>\n<p>Geddis said this was the court sending police a warning<\/p>\n<p>Judges had discretion to balance the severity of a breach with the importance of the evidence, he said.<\/p>\n<p>Geddis said the Court of Appeal ruling could take that argument off the table for police in future case.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The police are on notice, they know that this sort of photographing activity is unlawful.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And so in future cases the court is going to look at this behaviour and take a much harder line and say &#8216;you knew you weren&#8217;t allowed to do this, we won&#8217;t allow you to get away with it and bring the evidence in [to court].&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Police may now have to delete any pictures taken unlawfully in public where there was a reasonable expectation of privacy, Geddis said.<\/p>\n<p>Barrister Marie Taylor-Cyphers said she was concerned about how the court decision allowed the evidence to be used during the trial, regardless that it was gathered unlawfully.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It hasn&#8217;t been enough to win this appeal.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The risk I see there is that police [will] continue to act in that way because effectively there is no consequence for them.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h3>Police considering the judgement<\/h3>\n<p>Police said they were considering any potential implications arising from the judgement.<\/p>\n<p>They said some of the issues covered in the judgement were part of an ongoing review of the Evidence Act that was currently being consulted on.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The public can be confident that police have an ongoing commitment to balancing our operational requirements with the public&#8217;s right to privacy, and that police will continue to work with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner and the communities we serve on this issue,&#8221; a spokesperson said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Court of Appeal decision potentially limiting how police can photograph people in public could set a precedent the Police Association says would dramatically change how officers investigate crime. The court found\u00a0an officer illegally photographed a man during a random traffic stop, amounting to a breach of the Bill of Rights. The picture was cross [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":4394,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[222,174],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4393","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-latest-news","category-nz-news"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thebuzz.apnanetwork.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4393","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thebuzz.apnanetwork.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thebuzz.apnanetwork.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thebuzz.apnanetwork.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thebuzz.apnanetwork.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4393"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thebuzz.apnanetwork.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4393\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4395,"href":"https:\/\/thebuzz.apnanetwork.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4393\/revisions\/4395"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thebuzz.apnanetwork.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/4394"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thebuzz.apnanetwork.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thebuzz.apnanetwork.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thebuzz.apnanetwork.co.nz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}